-
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Seven Mile Lake Park DGC reviews
3
0
I shot 19 2+ years
Reviewed:
Played on:Aug 16, 2020
Played the course:once
Pros:
+Nice baskets. Innovas with Blue rings on top.
+Tees are marked
+Ace opportunities abound- esp first 3 holes
+Park is well maintained and scenic.
+A few trees in play. 4,5,9.
+Shouldn't lose a disc here (not impossible though)
+Beach, shelters, camping, sandbox, playground, bathrooms, easy parking are good amenities.
+Tees are marked
+Ace opportunities abound- esp first 3 holes
+Park is well maintained and scenic.
+A few trees in play. 4,5,9.
+Shouldn't lose a disc here (not impossible though)
+Beach, shelters, camping, sandbox, playground, bathrooms, easy parking are good amenities.
Cons:
-No real elevation change.
-Holes 1-3 are some of the shortest that I've played. They are also open so no real challenge there.
-1-3 also play pretty close to the beach and shelters. Good thing you should only throw a putter and have good control of it on such short holes.
-Tees are natural. Fine for the amount of traffic that you will probably get here.
-6-8 are pretty open. Could definitely get windy out here.
-Holes 1-3 are some of the shortest that I've played. They are also open so no real challenge there.
-1-3 also play pretty close to the beach and shelters. Good thing you should only throw a putter and have good control of it on such short holes.
-Tees are natural. Fine for the amount of traffic that you will probably get here.
-6-8 are pretty open. Could definitely get windy out here.
Other Thoughts:
-Holes 1-3 are all together the length of 1 hole.
-Holes 4 and 5 are probably the best stretch on the course. Both have more length and obstacles that the rest.
-6,7,8 are long enough but quite open.
-9 is a good closer but is much longer than the rest of the course. Longer than 1-3 combined I think.
-Had a hard time quantifying this rating. Could have gone 2.0. Definitely still had fun here despite the lack of distance on some holes and lack of obstacles on others.
-In all reality, this park is probably not big enough for a DGC as well as camping, shelters, beach, etc. Maybe a slightly more challenging and longer 6 holer could have been put in instead? Definitely better than nothing but this land was hard to work with as a designer.
-Holes 4 and 5 are probably the best stretch on the course. Both have more length and obstacles that the rest.
-6,7,8 are long enough but quite open.
-9 is a good closer but is much longer than the rest of the course. Longer than 1-3 combined I think.
-Had a hard time quantifying this rating. Could have gone 2.0. Definitely still had fun here despite the lack of distance on some holes and lack of obstacles on others.
-In all reality, this park is probably not big enough for a DGC as well as camping, shelters, beach, etc. Maybe a slightly more challenging and longer 6 holer could have been put in instead? Definitely better than nothing but this land was hard to work with as a designer.
