Pros:
Each hole is marked with a sign showing the hole number, hole layout, and yardage - while these are not Houck quality sings, there are a step up compared to most Houston course signage. The course also flows well, but a painted spoke from hole one to two would be nice.
Most holes are tightly wooded, and with many slight doglegs right, RHBH throwers are forced to really think through disc and shot selection. Pars aren't that hard to get, but a player must really work for a birdie.
With all of the growth, this would be a good course to play in the hot Houston summers since only hole six isn't shaded. Right now this is also a good course if you don't like competing with crowds of people.
BEST HOLE/S: #2
Cons:
The tee boxes are natural, and therefore are very uneven on soft ground, so a player needs to watch their footing.
Some of the holes (i.e. hole 2) are still too rough and wooded, but it's basically one person doing all of the clearing. Other areas just need some general course maintenance, and this course looks like it has the real potential to get muddy.
WORST HOLE/S: #1
Other Thoughts:
Obviously having only six holes on a small piece of land will limit this course from ever being anything great, but the overall feel, shaded areas, and use of the trees to shape each hole are decent. It was also nice on hole six to be able to open up and bomb a shot, even though everything fifty feet to right is O.B. You can tell the designer really wanted a hole on top of the little hill to add some extra challenge at the end.
I wouldn't call this a good stand-alone course, but with having 12 holes at Nottingham Park only a few miles away, a person could play both courses to get in a full 18 holes of solid golf. Also, if a player plays both courses together, they will appreciate the differences in it's hole designs that much more.