Pros:
-Multi use park in the middle of town. It appears to be a sports complex due to the number of ball fields and the ample parking available. There's a swimming pool closer to the entrance, even though the gates were closed. The park is set on a flat terrain, so there is less of a chance of getting worn out.
-Two sets of pads, the whites are suitable for all skill levels and have more ace opportunities. The blues are longer, but are still very fair and forgiving even for players with limited distance or less experience and still gives some opportunities to make birdies. Holes from the blue pads range from 240-600+ while the whites are 190'-480'.
-It's pretty open, a few holes have tight lines but even the more wooded holes are on grassy lands with plenty of space to throw comfortably without it being risky. Another reason why the blue pads are more forgiving. They are challenging, but they don't have any barriers. Such as having to be able to throw 300' or have a wide selection of discs to be able to score under par on. You could save par after a poor tee shot even from the longs, even though it be a little tougher. The lines Clanton have to offer are not all straightforward, but as long as you don't end up OB, it's easier to escape trouble here.
-I liked #5. Especially from the blue tee since its a par four that has you throwing over a creek and over a wide rill for the upshot.
So essentially two creeks. It's very open with one mando tree pointing left in the middle of the field. Fun bomber hole with basic accuracy requirements that are fair for everyone and fun enough. #2's blue pad utilizes the available elevation well. It's on top of a nice hill. Wish I saw more elevation here.
-#17's buried basket was cool. #6's elevated basket was a nice look. The rest of them were normal height, which is an excellent balance. Two baskets were different heights, making one putt easier and one more challenging.
Cons:
-There's some water here and there and the creeks tend to rise pretty fast. I played after a rainfall, so it gets quite wet.
-Lots of repetition. Many holes are very plain. You know, flat and partly wooded without much character. Many are close to ball fields and play along a walking trail. To make matters worse, the start of this course is the better of it. The first two holes play on the side of the hill while the rest of it is pretty similar to today's hits country. Plain, overrated, and far too similar. You know? Going skinny dipping with girls in teeny shorts? Bud light cans and used fire crackers all over the lawn? Waving glowsticks outside at the party while getting down to Gucci Gang? And "Pappy's belt made a wise and Godly man outta me and Imma raise my sons right with the sexy lady that twerked on me at the bar!"
The variety is extremely limited. I played the blues. Many of the holes are 300'-350', flat, and have little to no distinctiveness.
Other Thoughts:
-This style of disc golf to me is dated. It's incredibly weird that I'm comparing it to today's country music when you could probably convince many people that the first ever disc golf course was Clanton. But it's very plain and uneventful to me with a lot of generic similarities. I was extremely shocked to find out that it was designed in 2017. Disc golf is becoming more and more unique and has grown exponentially. This course looks like a test run for a brand new sport that was invented in the 70's. This kind of course is out of its prime. Almost like those baseball card packs with a piece of gum inside. I would understand if this course was designed back at the roots of disc golf, but it wasn't. Wish the land out back close to where the first two holes are was available. I think a better and more relevant course could be made out of that.
-I'm tempted to fool people into thinking that this was the first ever disc golf course. I know if someone told me that, I would've believed them firsthand.