- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 2,692
there isn't a thread dedicated to discussing recent reviews. i often feel it's not worth starting a thread just to make a minor note about a particular review but maybe a thread like this will spur more general discourse. we'll see if it catches on.
i was just reading DFrah's review of Oak Grove. it's a nice review, as per usual, and i can really relate to the navigation woes. i've played there a handful of times and had a lot of trouble the first couple rounds until i followed some local regulars.
my comment is that it's a classic example of how the strengths of a course to a local can be a bane to the traveling player. the confusing layout is likely to lead new locals to interacting with the regulars and that makes them more likely to discover the scene. the regulars don't need signage and enjoy the flexibility of the extra holes. i don't really know the detailed course history but i assume that older versions of the layout are still playable, probably by excluding several holes and playing alternate tees on others, and that is cool for the locals, the old-timers, and the history.
it was good to see DFrah be understanding and i agreed with this bit
but i suppose i probably disagree about the need for a redesign. tee signs and a course map would do wonders and i would be curious if they'd choose to number them 1-23 or have some extra holes be lettered instead of numbered. it would be cool if the signage made note of the original holes, added holes, and redesigned holes. after nearly 50 years, i think the pedestrians know what they are getting themselves into. i know that's not the most responsible outlook but i can't imagine the locals would accept losing any holes.
anyway, cheers to the good review, DFrah. sorry you didn't have time to take your time and join some local regulars. that's really the best way to play that course if you've never been.
i was just reading DFrah's review of Oak Grove. it's a nice review, as per usual, and i can really relate to the navigation woes. i've played there a handful of times and had a lot of trouble the first couple rounds until i followed some local regulars.
my comment is that it's a classic example of how the strengths of a course to a local can be a bane to the traveling player. the confusing layout is likely to lead new locals to interacting with the regulars and that makes them more likely to discover the scene. the regulars don't need signage and enjoy the flexibility of the extra holes. i don't really know the detailed course history but i assume that older versions of the layout are still playable, probably by excluding several holes and playing alternate tees on others, and that is cool for the locals, the old-timers, and the history.
it was good to see DFrah be understanding and i agreed with this bit
DFrah said:I was hoping to see some kind of high-quality commemorative plaque explaining how Steady Ed helped get the world's first course installed here in 1975, and added baskets in 1976. In retrospect, I should have known better. The rusty "Frisbee Golf Course" sign on the park drive and the "World's First Disc Golf Course - 1975" note taped to the power line pole are way more in line with how our sport got started.
but i suppose i probably disagree about the need for a redesign. tee signs and a course map would do wonders and i would be curious if they'd choose to number them 1-23 or have some extra holes be lettered instead of numbered. it would be cool if the signage made note of the original holes, added holes, and redesigned holes. after nearly 50 years, i think the pedestrians know what they are getting themselves into. i know that's not the most responsible outlook but i can't imagine the locals would accept losing any holes.
anyway, cheers to the good review, DFrah. sorry you didn't have time to take your time and join some local regulars. that's really the best way to play that course if you've never been.