Pros:
It's a city park course with excellent MVP baskets.
For a tiny course there is good use of elevation.
Cons:
Boy of boy. The issues with this course.....
1. Basket location/Teepad location. - It's really awful here, My drive on Hole 1 ended on Hole 2 teepad, inside circle 1. I also landed on the hole 3 teepad from Hole 2. If fact, with the exception of 7 and subsequently the hole 8 teepad; I think every basket is within circle 2 for the previous hole's drive. That's pretty bad.
2. dirt pads, basically would be unplayable if it rained. as it
hasn't rained in awhile I was fine today.
3. Hole design. Well well well. We all know the 2 famous Rec Level / amateur disc golf course designers. Mr Forehand and Mr Backhand. It goes like this. Mr Backhand likes to put courses in that feature a lot of RHBH hyzers because that's what they throw. Then there's Mr. Forehand who comes along and says....hey hey hey....what don't you just do everything opposite that way it'll be challenging. Most folks would say, lets have a mixture. Not these folks. Mr Forehand must have compromising photos of the town's mayor. Every optimal line on this course with the exception of Hole 8 is forehand. If you have a 250ft forehand or a very solid turnover game you should shoot -5 or better. if you don''t you will be faced with low ceilings and/or much more difficult lines on most of the course.
Other Thoughts:
I've said it before in other reviews and I'll say it again here. Scouts should not be designing/building disc golf courses. I don't know when this became a thing. They almost never have real pads and typically have poor design and worst of all is they ruin a potential opportunity for a properly designed disc golf course to go in that park or in the town. Yes its obviously cheaper than paying a professional or using Gateway and their design services/baskets if you are close-ish to St. Louis but cheaper is almost never better. And now the city has to maintain that course. It will now be even more difficult for a proper course to be installed because that would be a 2nd course for the city to maintain. This is why these Scouts courses have to stop. Unless they are only retrofitting an existing course with baskets and/or new pads. It's ok short term but terrible long term.
The sad thing is this course has great baskets on an otherwise crummy course.
Sometimes another course isn't always a good thing. Improving an unplayed/unpopular course is great is you hire someone for the re-design who knows what they are doing. Using funds to buy nice baskets only to have the course design stink doesn't make sense.
This park could have held 6-7 good holes but they sandwiched 9 in. More isn't always better especially when it means good drives can land on other teepads!