Pros:
O.T. Sloan Is a pleasant, short-to-mid-range course. Plenty of enjoyable layouts makes for a good round.
- Course is seemingly getting a makeover. As such, when I played in September '19, there were holes were the tee sign and basket number did not match. If you follow the basket number, you'll be fine.
- Plenty of birdie chances and/or ace runs here. 11 of 18 holes have 'listed' distances of less than 250 feet. All 11 of these holes are in the woods, so there's still an element of challenge to them.
- Easy navigation. You pull up in the parking lot and the first tee is steps away. From there, most transitions are straight forward and/or are aided by next hole signs. On an aside, maybe a local can explain why the next hole signs are in the shape of airplanes? I'm missing the connection.
- Front nine is exclusively wooded. Back nine has some open layouts. A common theme of the open holes is to tee off in the grass and have the basket and putting circle back in the woods. You see this on #10, 15, and 16.
- A small but significant touch. Each basket has a large pink marker on top. It's not easy spotting a grey metal basket in the woods. It is easy, however, spotting a large pink marker on top. I wish more courses had this.
- Good course for beginners and casual players. With an average hole length under 250 feet, big arms aren't needed. Little chance to lose discs. Wooded holes are generally very forgiving. Even a first timer should be able to make a couple excellent shots while not having (m)any disaster holes.
- Hole #3 may be the best on the course. A downhill, wooded layout that plays a fair amount longer than the listed 184 feet (seemed much closer to 250 feet). If I had thrown the correct disc, it might have been a good shot. Or, I'd just hit another tree 40-feet further down the fairway.
- This seemed like a nice small-town park. A nice swimming pool, with lanes, maintained tennis courts, dog park, and a rec center. When I played on a Saturday afternoon, two of the three parking lots were completely empty. I had to make sure the park wasn't closed.
Cons:
The current design/navigation issues will need to be addressed and sooner than later. For all I know, this has been an issue for two weeks, two months, or two years.
- Of those issues, multiple hole distances are incorrect. #3 was a good 50 - 75 feet longer than its listed length. #10 was probably 75 feet shorter than listed. #11 wasn't close to 405 feet. #14 played much longer than its listed length. Several others were clearly wrong as well.
- A complete lack of consistency in the tee areas. #1 was sand. Several were indeed concrete tee pads. Several were dirt; some were marked with spray paint; some were ambiguous areas; and then #18 was brick pavers. It's semi-acceptable on a short course. It wouldn't be on a longer, better layout.
- More navigation issues. After #3, there's a sprayed painted box on the ground. That makes you think this should be the tee pad for #4. I play the hole, which was also had an incorrectly listed hole length, putt out at the basket for #4, walk to a concrete tee pad, and see a tee marker for hole #4. Umm, what?
- On the back nine, this is where the redesign breaks down. I never saw any tee markings for #13, so I keep walking and hoping to find one. Instead, I find the basket. I'm guessing there was something in the ground I missed.
- Any one of these problems can be forgiven. When they're all piling up - not sure if you're on the correct hole, not sure a hole's length, not sure if you missed a hole, etc. - it gets frustrating.
- I didn't notice any basic amenities on the course - benches or trash cans - at any point. I don't know if the rest rooms or water fountains are accessible in the rec center building.
Other Thoughts:
The best thing about Sloan is that its problems can all seemingly be easily fixed. Get someone out to the course with a wheel to re-measure the layouts. That problem is fixed. Make sure each tee marker exists and is correct. Two easy fixes. It would take a couple of locals one Saturday morning to make the course better.
- I intentionally left as many hole numbers out of my review. Based on previous reviews, its clear many holes have been renumbered in the redesign. Take for example, there's a tee marker for #18 next to the parking lot. That doesn't exist anymore.
- The front nine, with its wooded layout, a hint of elevation, and risk/reward quotient, it's a perfectly fun short-course play. It's got a lot of vibes of Elon Eager Beaver's layout in Charlotte.
- The back nine does step up the level of difficulty and length. I didn't use a driver/fairway-driver once on the front nine but did use it six times on the back nine. You're going from a lot of holes in the 200 - 250-foot range on the front, and more in the 275 - 350 on the backside.
- The wooded holes are more than fair. There's plenty of room to carve shots around trees. The only tight fairway was #3. That was also the only hole I was tempted to throw multiple shots for fun.
- Based on the propensity for small-town courses to get overrated by locals, I was concerned this course had a sub-3.0 rating. Based on my rating scale, that rating is pretty close to spot on. Compared to other courses of the same length and challenge, this course does compare favorably to Elon Eager Beaver (Charlotte), Wellspring (Burlington - sorry BD doesn't like my 3.0 rating for that course) and Cornwallis (Durham).
- I feel good about giving this course a 2.5 rating. Once the redesign is complete and signage, etc. is updated, this will be closer to a 3.0 in my book.