Sunset Hills, MO

Watson Trail Park

Permanent course
2.635(based on 24 reviews)
Filter course reviews

Filter reviews

Filter reviews

Watson Trail Park reviews

Filter
4 1
TheGoldenPutter
Experience: 15.1 years 52 played 9 reviews
1.50 star(s)

2+ years drive by

Reviewed: Updated: Played on:Jun 26, 2012 Played the course:2-4 times

Pros:

+ Decent elevation (nothing too big though)

+ #1 is a nice risk/reward type hole. You can go for the very protected straight path but have a short approach, or go to the open left but have a longer approach shot.

+ Maintenance is decent, not as much mulch as there used to though.
+ Cool water fall behind #4's pin.

Cons:

- The flow is awful! Especially the walk from 6 to 7. If it is your first time playing here you WILL get lost and confused, there are multiple spots where you can't find the tee or don't know which direction to go after you complete a hole.

- Holes are on the short side. If you like throwing a buzzz you'll throw it alot.

- All the holes have a simple line (except for #1 (see pros) and #2 which is just cluttered with small trees)

- Nothing to help navigation so it can be troublesome
- Natural tee pads
- Stinky pond that doesn't really come into play
- The course is short and scrunched in along with other park activities.

- Baskets are shallow and have only 1 layer of chains so I had a few disappointing booted putts.

- Usually crowded, and when I went last time it was full of obnoxious teens that weren't to friendly.

Other Thoughts:

> Short and scrunched
> Either a simple line or overly wooded.
> Crowded

> As you might have already guessed, I don't like this course. There are much better courses in the area. The best 9 hole is probably Schroeder (Manchester). So if this is your first time in the area or thinking about playing this course, take my advice and play somewhere else, you will have a much better experience.

***** If you didn't find this review helpful, or want more info, please let me know and send a personal message to me so I can help.
Was this review helpful? Yes No
7 1
stubborn puppet
Silver level trusted reviewer
Experience: 13.2 years 48 played 27 reviews
1.50 star(s)

Slowly failing... 2+ years drive by

Reviewed: Updated: Played on:Aug 23, 2011 Played the course:5+ times

Pros:

It's a very technical course that feels longer than it is because of the terrain and trees and it's in a part of the St.Louis area where there are currently no other courses to play. The tight spaces and all the skinny trees really make even an experienced player stop and think about their line, disc and approach strategy. The course gives you an opportunity for variety in both your throw style and discs used.
There are trash cans at every tee and the park is really clean.
There are really excellent score cards/maps in the box at tee-pad 1 at all times.
Although the holes at this course are mostly short by contrast to parks like Creve Coeur and Sioux Passage, there are a few that you can actually let it rip a bit on... but it has to be a very accurate rip; just a few feet off in either direction and you're going to nail a tree and turn that big drive into a big mistake. Even holes, like 2, with an easily reachable distance require a perfect line (and a little luck) to reach the bucket through the trees.
Holes 2,5 and 7 offer a cool (and narrow) dual path to the pin scenario so that you can choose your backhand or forehand, hyzer or anhyzer throw, in an attempt to trace the best safe path to the basket.
I like that each of the baskets are bright and easy to see and have the hole number as well as the Par clearly labeled right on them to see from any direction.
Another great thing about this course is that it is ALL in the nice, shady woods; that's a BIG and welcome benefit in the summer heat.

Cons:

It has some tee navigation problems for 1st time visitors who don't grab a map/scorecard: it's easy to get mixed up at the bridge that runs between tee 3 and 5. then it's a little walk down the path, over a different bridge and past the pond to 4. Hole 5 is right up the hill from 4's basket on the opposite end of the bridge you tee off 3 from and then hole 6 is at the top of the wood and stone staircase just past basket 5. Then there's 7... hmm, 7... has anyone seen 7? Well, 7 is back north into the park, across the path between the lake and the playground and NOPE, that's 9, keep walking and look to the left. "Oh, there's 7." Then you walk up the stairs and past the flower garden to find... tee 8. Now, you can march back down the slope to the left, taking you across the middle of the 9 fairway to find tee 9 and throw a really awkward, non-disc-golf-like shot back up the hill and you're done. Other issues are the worn-down dirt and terrible gravel tee's built by some Eagle Scouts. Some occasional marshiness on the south side of the fairway on 7 and a general lack of maintenance.
What really stinks about this course is the parks dept treating it like the unwanted stepchild - it get's no respect and no love... seems like it is intentionally neglected and set up to cater to as few players as possible.

UPDATE: A couple of baskets have been damaged (bent and beat out of shape and they stand crooked) over the course of 2014 and the parks dept. has done nothing about it (and the club has been told that our assistance is not needed).

Other Thoughts:

When it's been raining in St. Louis (despite what it seems would be the case with a mostly dirt course) Watson Trails dries quick and can generally be played the day after a storm. Another unexpected thing on this all-woods course is that it's easy to find your disc (except for really bad throws on 7...) because there isn't much underbrush.

UPDATE: All the maintenance on the course/park has done nothing to improve the course, except cleaning up the disaster of honeysuckle and weeds on the left side of 7's fairway. Hole 9's tee was moved to a terrible position that doesn't make any sense at all - discs just don't fly that way folks. The parks dept's efforts at controlling runoff and erosion were poorly planned and executed - the problem is just as bad as before and left some boggy areas to deal with. Vandalism and graffiti continue to be a problem at a park in the middle of a "wealthy" neighborhood and right next door to the police station - WTF? Also, some really dumb tee posts, which look at home on a run down mini-golf course were put in last year and half of them are right where you're going to hit them with your hand when you throw - watch out.
IMPORTANT NOTES: All the tee signs are WRONG. All holes are par 3 except hole 1 is par 4... and the distances are off because this course has been rearranged several times to make room for other parks projects.
Was this review helpful? Yes No
2 3
Brunked
Experience: 2 played 2 reviews
1.50 star(s)

Watson Trail Review 2+ years drive by

Reviewed: Played on:Apr 6, 2009 Played the course:5+ times

Pros:

wood chips on fairway and tee for mud
bright yellow baskets
double tees if you can find them

Cons:

short pars
unlevel tees
heavily wooded
unclear signing
only 9 holes
large elevation change
some distance between tees
Was this review helpful? Yes No
12 0
Three Putt
Staff member
Diamond level trusted reviewer
Premium Member
Experience: 29.3 years 152 played 127 reviews
1.50 star(s)

Putter Course 2+ years

Reviewed: Updated: Played on:Jul 8, 2007 Played the course:5+ times

Pros:

2020 Edit: This course has been tweaked since I wrote this review with some improvements, so it's not as terrible as it was in 2007. It's not as good as it was in the 90's (it was a solid 3.0 back in the day) but it's an OK rec course. The Ace run on hole 4 has grown on me and it has some other fun elements. I will fully edit this review when I get a chance, but until I do you shouldn't read it. It's out of date.

This is a busy 9-hole course. It seems to have a loyal following amongst local players.

Cons:

This is not a very well thought out design. Most of the holes are pretty short and easy, and most of them could be toughened up with just a little effort. For example, # 6 is a short shot across a wide open field to a wide open basket. The basket could easily be tucked up into the woods to make the hole more difficult. The basket for # 9 has been moved far down the hill from its old placement, making the hole play much shorter and taking a lot of challenge out of the uphill shot. The landscaping (or lack of it) on #5 is going to develop into a major erosion problem. Several of the holes mix in blind shots down a walking path, giving me some safety concerns. After I finished # 7, I looked for # 8 for 10 minutes. I eventually found the basket and had to backtrack to the tee. There are tee signs, but other than that many of the tees are not marked.

Other Thoughts:

This course originally was a pretty challenging nine holes. It was a heavily wooded course that went throughout the park along a walking path. The park department got a grant to make the path handicapped accessible and blacktopped it, forcing the course to be moved. The new course is crammed into a corner of the park, and the shots are short and shorter. Only #7 and # 9 remain from the original design. If you are visiting St. Louis, this course should be at the bottom of your list.
Was this review helpful? Yes No

Latest posts

Top