First course where I was one of the main co designers was Riney B.
http://www.dgcoursereview.com/course.php?id=465&mode=ci
Hole 9 I was given pretty free reign on it's layout. It was going to be my baby. I had this kooky idea that I was going to make it a hole where you throw a 100ft placement shot to a landing zone turn right then a 250ft shot to the pin. Yeah it was a pretty awful idea but we cut the fairway for it anyway.
Needless to say it didnt work and now every time I see a hole where all you can do is throw a 100 ft layup shot then turn at a right or left angle and throw 200ft+ to the pin I get knotted up inside.
Those of you who live here in central NC know what I'm talking about.
Luckly I came to my senses after testing out the hole and scrapped it for its current layout where you throw uphill straight out of the woods to the open and then either to the left down hill to the pin with the pond behind it or to the right under some low pear trees.
the lesson was that even though you think something is gonna be revolutionary and innovative and cool, probably the reason you never see a hole like that is
BECAUSE IT SUCKS .
Funny thing is that when I was working on clearing out the final layout for that hole, Lyle snuck in the short pin placement on hole 21 which was a 150ft 90 degree shot around a huge tree. :\
I honestly dont know what was wrong with us that week.
The good thing was , was that we were able to get lots of feed back before we put in pads and tweak stuff so that all the holes played well. Lyle was a very by the book designer so we really didnt mess up too much and if so we were able to fix issues, well except the flooding and drainage issues due to the beavers.
One of our main lessons with Riney was dont design a course during a drought.
Another was dont design holes using invasive species as fairway edges (Parks and Rec is going hogwild with removing Bush HoneySuckle at the moment) Alot of courses in the Lexington area have drastically changed for the worse because of this.