• Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
    It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)

Disc Golf Courses On Ski Resorts Opinions and such

Casey 1988

Shun the frumious Bandersnatch!
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,666
Location
Pierre, South Dakota, USA
It seems that Ski Resorts during the off season are starting to make use of the land with Disc Golf courses, a low cost way to use the land. I feel some of these courses can be more challenging then some as the elevation can make for a harder course. I have seen some that the holes were not well done or had lower quality baskets One had just D-B5 baskets from Lightning unaltered so if you were to putt either not hard enough or too hard the disc would not go in the basket, the Problem with the D-B5 baskets. The Holes however on that course were difficult as one if you missed to the left at all the disc falls down a 100 foot drop, another was from the top of the Ski Slope to about 50 feet from the Main Building. That course was well done except the course was two separate 9 hole courses, that we played as bottom 9 and then top 9. The way the two courses played it made sense to play bottom 9 first.

What do you think about courses on Ski reasorts and or how do feel about them?
 
Boyne Mountain, https://www.dgcoursereview.com/course.php?id=1035 is a fantastic disc golf adventure. The course is not fantastic, with sand tee pads, a couple sand holes and older equipment, but there are some terrific holes and throws. Take a chair lift to the top, with a bar/restaurant by hole one. Then play down the mountain. Not every hole is down hill, but the course plays more down than up. The icing on the cake is the resort. Two pools, championship stick golf, half a dozen restaurants on site, a ton of quality course nearby, lakes and fishing all around. Golf all day, park you car and enjoy your evenings. I vote yes to ski resorts.
 
Not a huge fan in general because the design typically just monotonously follows down the existing ski slopes and gets repetitive and the terrain is often too extreme to have real golf holes and a pain in the legs. Also often windy and not very well maintained with high risk of disc loss. Also typically if a ski resort has disc golf, they also have downhill mountain biking which often crosses paths with the dg course. I often get the feeling that disc golf is just an after thought. The highlight of these courses is most often the ski lift ride up.

Now take the example of Smuggler's Notch Ski Resort, they put disc golf on their own mountain ridge area separated away from the ski and biking areas. The elevation and terrain is much more suitable for the dg courses and provides better variety and feels like a much more satisfying disc golf experience playing on real dedicated courses, and also hiking through the woods without the ugly ski lifts and equipment and crazy bikers. If more ski resorts put disc golf in their own area and maintained them, the potential is definitely there for some really amazing courses.
 
I thoroughly enjoyed Telemark, if anyone remembers that one. I thought it was nicely designed using ups, downs, side-slopes, and hilly access-road areas. The only thing I hated was the first hole with its artificial concrete "lake" playing over what may have once been a parking lot, or tennis courts, or basketball courts... or something.
 
Like all course models (city, private, wooded, multipurpose) there are some more enjoyable than others.

Its once again about the design and quality, rather than just throwing a course in because the ski report "can".
 
The ski resort courses that I've played are kind of like golf courses with more extreme changes in elevation.
 
There are sometimes restrictions when doing ski hill designs that prevents removing brush, limbs and trees to tuck pin placements since it would open up holes in the tree line for the skiers. I think cross country ski trails can be better shared use tracks with more undulating terrain versus the steeper ski hills.
 
It sounds like you just played a less than awesome course. But most of the ski resort courses I have played in Colorado have been very enjoyable.
 
Zielinec in Poland has such a course, I go there every year for the tournament, it's great fun. I love the big airtime on the downhill bombs.

The walking can be hard on the knees though, going downhill all the time.
 
very happy to see this trend. 00 worlds or something like that utilized an arizona ski resort (hard to believe skiing in arizona).

education and benchmarks will improve these designs.

i tend to seek these out because of the views. which by the way can sway my opinions/reviews of courses.
 
Not a huge fan in general because the design typically just monotonously follows down the existing ski slopes and gets repetitive and the terrain is often too extreme to have real golf holes and a pain in the legs. Also often windy and not very well maintained with high risk of disc loss. Also typically if a ski resort has disc golf, they also have downhill mountain biking which often crosses paths with the dg course. I often get the feeling that disc golf is just an after thought. The highlight of these courses is most often the ski lift ride up.

Now take the example of Smuggler's Notch Ski Resort, they put disc golf on their own mountain ridge area separated away from the ski and biking areas. The elevation and terrain is much more suitable for the dg courses and provides better variety and feels like a much more satisfying disc golf experience playing on real dedicated courses, and also hiking through the woods without the ugly ski lifts and equipment and crazy bikers. If more ski resorts put disc golf in their own area and maintained them, the potential is definitely there for some really amazing courses.

I so agree eith Sidewinder's first paragraph. I've played maybe a dozen ski resort courses. First, understand the difference when they say playing a ski hill versus a ski resorts. Those ski hills in Minnesota or Michigan are way different than some of the extreme ski resorts courses in Washington, Oregon, California, Colorado where you take a chair up to 6000'-8000'.

My reviews sound like a broken record. They all complain about the same things. But let me preface this by stating that my reviews are from a seasoned veteran (nice way of saying I'm old, tired, not in the best shape, creaky knees, feet, hips, eyes). You younger players can handle the extreme downhill hiking better. If you've never played a ski resort, you have to experience it. It's awesome to watch your disc sail down that hill for epic distances.

My typical complaints:

Expensive to play. Chairlift tickets from $8-$20.

Always, always terrible natural, tee pads. Rocky, dangerous, etc.

Almost always, the signage is poor.

Always cheap temporary baskets.

Almost always, the design lacks creativity. The course is temporary and is an afterthought.

The terrain is always unbelievably rough and hard to walk on and especially down the mountain. It is covered with snow 9 months a year.

You're going to lose many discs as they sail down the mountain/hill for 500' plus. Bring lots of throwaways that are expendable.

I played these where you step up to the tee and there is no basket visible. Are you prepared to walk straight down 500' to locate a basket and then hike up the same 500' to tee off? When you are already beat and exhausted?

Often there is extreme wind.

When you disc starts to fade L-R, it may fade for 200', never to be seen again.
 
I've only played ski hill courses in Michigan, not any ski resorts. If done well (like Hanson Hills in Grayling) they're cool. Way more of a hike/workout than a typical round of disc.
 
Not a fan. The throw from the top is almost never worth the climb, especially when you're 64 with bad knees and COPD. Unless it has a lift and plays from top to bottom, I'm not interested.
 
Not a fan. An elevation change of 15-20' over the length of a hole is enough for me.
 
One of my favorite courses in the state is a ski hill in the winter. Silver Mountain. Good signage, DISCatchers, decently maintained grass tee areas, good balance of wooded holes and more open holes, and of course, good elevation change. It's a hell of a work out, but well balanced and a ton of fun!

Mt. Zion is another Ski Hill course in Ironwood, managed by our own Jeremy Hilss. A 9 hole mix of open and wooded with carpet tees, nice signage, and another workout of a hike. It's not for everyone as it is more physically demanding, but you get some amazing views and a total different experience from most courses. I'm hoping to be able to get to Zion when I'm up that way in two weeks. I love the change of pace.
 
I love them! I'm almost 50 and I'm not even in good shape. I guess the whiners here are fat asses who think lifting 12 ounces at a time is a workout.

I would play these courses every day if I could. What's better than bombing discs 800-1200 feet at a time with awesome views and the course to yourself? I've played Aspen Mountain in CO, Crystal Mountain in WA, Snowbowl in AZ, and a couple others and they're excellent.

Valkyrie Kid, I see you appear to be swinging through Michigan. If you make it to Spirit Mountain in Duluth you'll find a ski area course to your liking. It has nice paver stone tee pads, good DGA baskets, altitude is under 2,000 ft so your old lungs can breath, and it's only $6 to play.
 

Latest posts

Top