- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 15,715
Like many, I prefer wooded and technical to wide open (something that is reflected in my ratings for the most part), HOWEVER...open courses dont get a ton of love from any real players here. I wouldn't play disc golf if all we had were wide open golf course style courses.
1. When you live in an area dominated by wooded/brushy courses (like me), getting out on course that's fairly open like The Ponds at Lakeshore, or The Lyon's Den can be a very refreshing change of pace. Having that kind of variety available to you locally can actually help keep you engaged in the game, as opposed to most of the courses in a given area feeling pretty much the same in a lot of ways.
2) Successfully creating a reasonably challenging course on a piece of fairly open property is in many ways more difficult than doing so in the woods. Just to clarify: I'm referring strictly to the actual laying out and design of a course, and not at all to the amount of physical work involved in making it happen.
You really need consider the angles shots are likely to come in from to really make the most of the few obstacles the property offers. I'm not saying either of the courses I've linked is a masterpiece, but I will say designers did a better job on those two courses than on several of the wooded courses in the area (some of which I myself have rated higher than those two), partially due to the fact that some parcels simply make it easier to layout a course that's fun and challenging.
How well designers bring (or fail to bring) certain elements into play is something I've come to appreciate. I notice it as I work my way through a course, and it contributes to my overall enjoyment of the game. I really admire where people do more with less, kinda like a coach who wins a championship without necessarily having the most talented players.
Last edited: