46YearOldSlinger
Double Eagle Member
I got my first copy of the magazine about 10 days ago but still no shirt even though it's been well over a month since the order was placed.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Exactly. That's why I wanna know if it is even any good. I can definitely see something like this being flashy with little substance. I hope that's not the case, though.
would be nice if somebody that has gotten the magazine would jump into 2014 and scan & upload so the rest of the civilized world can actually see this content.It would be nice if someone that has gotten the magazine can review the content and articles in it for us. I would like to know if it is entertaining, informational, good pictures, and worth the subscription. So if you got it please let us know what you think of it.
would be nice if somebody that has gotten the magazine would jump into 2014 and scan & upload so the rest of the civilized world can actually see this content.
you know... we need to 'grow the sport' and all that jazz.
illegal or not... it gets more eyes on their advertisers messages.Not that it effects me income-wise, as I work on a non-monetary payment from Hucker, but that is highly illegal.
Just saying.
illegal or not... it gets more eyes on their advertisers messages.
more eyes on the product = more ad revenue. subscriptions should supplement ad revenue, not the other way around.
not to mention the fact that they might actually pick up some extra subs now that people can actually SEE the product they are purchasing. most people aren't silly/foolish enough to throw money at unproven products.
Just out of curiosity, what exactly constitutes "flashy with little substance" writing in The Mad, Mad World of disc golf journalism? Examples?
eh. your opinion. thanks for sharing. its a bit outdated (IMO).If the guys who produce the magazine want to post it online, that should be their decision. Someone else scanning it and posting it is unacceptable, and rationalizing such an action by saying that you're "helping" them is ridiculous.
Feel free to post pics from my article since the publisher approved it
Sure Andy!
eh. your opinion. thanks for sharing. its a bit outdated (IMO).
i don't think its unacceptable at all. piracy - in its own strange way - is being proven to actually HELP content creators. either people NEVER see your content... or they see it for free and possibly end up supporting you and your advertisers in the future (See: G.O.T. DVD/Blue-ray sales despite being the most pirated content in the history of the internet).
the first option equals zero extra money - end of story. the second may equal zero but, at least, has a chance to turn into something more.
pretty easy decision for anybody that understands how the media industry is trending.