To put it short and sweet there are a lot of people in the chicagoland area trying "a lot of different" ways and approaches to get courses in. Some things work, some things don't. It basically boils down to who owns the property (public or private). Right now public is our best bet, but private would be ideal. Some public park land does have a lot of potential, but unfortunately it can be a "process" putting something together......and a "process" getting everything done. Unless you have an army of residents that support installing a course in their public park it can definitely be a struggle. Private land owners would be the best IMO to deal with because there is very little "red tape" involved compared to park districts/preserves. The problem with private land owners in the Chicago area is the price of the land. Convincing a private landowner to use their land for a potentially great pay to play course would be hard. There just isn't enough data out there to support whether or not pay to play could be profitable.
Also FWIW, if our disc golf community as a hole wasn't as segregated (and I use that term loosely). I believe we could get better courses/tournaments/even good pay to plays. I'm not trying to take a direct shot at the clubs, because the clubs have done a great deal for disc golf. That comment is directed towards the politics......A lot of disc golf hot spots IMO have one thing in common.......less politics.
Or maybe I'm just too idealistic.
FWIW. I think things are starting to change as a whole though, but it will be gradual