Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
So MD3's are less stable than a fresh roc3? Similar to a beat roc3
The MD3 and Roc3 have very similar flights in my opinion. If there's a difference in stability then it's negligible. Granted I'm working from memory and haven't thrown any of my Roc3's in a couple years.
Is star less stable than c line in this disc?
Has anyone thrown the new Italian plastic MD3? Can you compare it to some other mids? I haven't thrown an MD3 of any kind.
the new md3 looks to have flight numbers of 5 5 0 1 vs 5 5 0 2 for the majority of innova produced md3s (I believe the original numbers were 5 5 0 3 but that was before my time throwing them
Flights numbers mean nothing.
Look at the P2. 2301 forever. Then the final Innova run was 2302. Now it's back to 2301. And they all fly exactly the same.
Flights numbers mean nothing.
Look at the P2. 2301 forever. Then the final Innova run was 2302. Now it's back to 2301. And they all fly exactly the same.
How many tries/years did it take the Trilogy brands to make a Teebird that some people like similarly?
Imagine if a company then started making every disc from new molds simultaneously. I already thought the whole runs thing with DM discs was way more picky than I want to be, I couldn't imagine the situation with pre/post changing all molds and manufacturing location as well.
I will be curious to see the MD3 wing compared to the L64 Trust, because they fly like the same disc.
I have both and they are practically identical except of course the md3 has the microbead, but wing shape is spot on. I just wish the new md3 was a bit flatter for my grip.
I have both and they are practically identical except of course the md3 has the microbead, but wing shape is spot on. I just wish the new md3 was a bit flatter for my grip.
After all, it is the 'Innova Flight Rating System'.