Kind of the thing is the overwhelming majority of us have little experience playing outside whatever areas or cities we've lived in or traveled. Are any of us really qualified to compare places we've been to against places we haven't?
Certainly not as well as if we'd traveled there.
What do I know of Michigan, Minnesota, or Wisconsin disc golf? I've played in 24 states but, sadly, none of those. I know raw data---such as in the Ultiworld article, and other places---that there are lots of courses. And I have a pretty good idea of the climate.
I haven't played the top courses, but I can get something of an idea from photos. Not nearly as good as playing, of course, but something.
I've read reviews, and posts, and talked to people, who have played there and many other regions---including places I'm familiar with, which helps. And though many of the ratings are from people confined to a region, enough are done by better-traveled people that they average out fairly well---I have fairly good confidence that top-rated courses are good, wherever they are.
All of which comes far short my actually
knowing how those places compare to places I've played. So I guess I'd say I feel I can make a comparison---but it's certainly not as valid as someone who has thoroughly played multiple regions.