I'm growing tired of reading reviews by people who downgrade a course review simply because there is no water on the property, or more specifically, no holes with water.
In the mountains, there isn't that much water in general. We have rivers, streams, tributaries, and reservoirs, we don't have many lakes or bodies of water in general.
What we do have is mountains, or big-ass hills.
So I'm curious, if you are one who downgrades a course simply because it doesn't have water holes, why are you not also downgrading courses that don't have mountains?!?!
I think it's silly to downgrade a course simply because of the terrain. I get it if it's wide open and very little structure. But please consider not downgrading a course just because it lacks water or mountains. Disc golf course designers work with the terrain that they have to work with. We can't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars adding artificial elements (like traditional golf). Most of these courses you get to play for free or for a few bucks...
In the mountains, there isn't that much water in general. We have rivers, streams, tributaries, and reservoirs, we don't have many lakes or bodies of water in general.
What we do have is mountains, or big-ass hills.
So I'm curious, if you are one who downgrades a course simply because it doesn't have water holes, why are you not also downgrading courses that don't have mountains?!?!
I think it's silly to downgrade a course simply because of the terrain. I get it if it's wide open and very little structure. But please consider not downgrading a course just because it lacks water or mountains. Disc golf course designers work with the terrain that they have to work with. We can't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars adding artificial elements (like traditional golf). Most of these courses you get to play for free or for a few bucks...