...and while I'm on my soapbox, examiner.com articles too, or any website that lets some amateur self-proclaimed journalist rehash some semi-plagiarized material from someplace else, so they can get $.0002 every time some fool clicks on it.
I have a link set up to get Google news articles for disc golf news from around the country, and while I used to get links to nice articles from local rags about new courses going in, about half of what I see now are YCN articles from this K.C. Dermody gal, who apparently writes on a variety of topics, and has for whatever reason started writing about disc golf, specifically PDGA tournaments.
Now, does this gal actually go out to disc golf tournaments and interview people or take in the action like a real reporter from your newspaper would? No, she pretty much just takes the PDGA tournament schedule and results, and rehashes it into paragraph form. I can honestly say that she was not anywhere near the B-tier I was at a couple weeks ago. The photo accompanying the article isn't even from that course! Its just a stock photo from wikipedia.
We also had a member here who was constantly posting spam links to his "this week in disc golf" articles in the tournaments forum. (Dig down enough in there and you'll find some of them). Don't see him much any more. Maybe he finally got the hint.
I seriously don't know why people who waste their time doing these articles think they're contributing anything meaningful. Is the meager pay they get for these things really that good? I mean anybody with an tenth grade understanding of English can rehash a results page from an event they were nowhere near and puff it up into nice fluffy air filled paragraphs (kinda like store brand bread), but once you've read one of these folks articles, you've essentially read them all.
So Ms. Dermody, I doubt you're reading this, and doubt that you care if you are, but seriously, one person's advice here....give up please. Nobody cares to read an article that could have likely wrote themselves, or perhaps wrote even better considering that they were actually at said event. You're better off sticking to writing about vacation hotspots or the latest Kim Kardashian drama, assuming that you're not just rehashing that from somewhere else as well.
And while I'm one here, does anyone know some boolean magic that I can add to my bookmark link to make these gawd awful articles go away?
I have a link set up to get Google news articles for disc golf news from around the country, and while I used to get links to nice articles from local rags about new courses going in, about half of what I see now are YCN articles from this K.C. Dermody gal, who apparently writes on a variety of topics, and has for whatever reason started writing about disc golf, specifically PDGA tournaments.
Now, does this gal actually go out to disc golf tournaments and interview people or take in the action like a real reporter from your newspaper would? No, she pretty much just takes the PDGA tournament schedule and results, and rehashes it into paragraph form. I can honestly say that she was not anywhere near the B-tier I was at a couple weeks ago. The photo accompanying the article isn't even from that course! Its just a stock photo from wikipedia.
We also had a member here who was constantly posting spam links to his "this week in disc golf" articles in the tournaments forum. (Dig down enough in there and you'll find some of them). Don't see him much any more. Maybe he finally got the hint.
I seriously don't know why people who waste their time doing these articles think they're contributing anything meaningful. Is the meager pay they get for these things really that good? I mean anybody with an tenth grade understanding of English can rehash a results page from an event they were nowhere near and puff it up into nice fluffy air filled paragraphs (kinda like store brand bread), but once you've read one of these folks articles, you've essentially read them all.
So Ms. Dermody, I doubt you're reading this, and doubt that you care if you are, but seriously, one person's advice here....give up please. Nobody cares to read an article that could have likely wrote themselves, or perhaps wrote even better considering that they were actually at said event. You're better off sticking to writing about vacation hotspots or the latest Kim Kardashian drama, assuming that you're not just rehashing that from somewhere else as well.
And while I'm one here, does anyone know some boolean magic that I can add to my bookmark link to make these gawd awful articles go away?