Pros:
-Good use of property.
-Easy to follow layout. (The red paint on the basket indicated where the next tee was.)
-Trees used in a challenging way.
-The two holes that used sidewalk as tee pads were definitely welcome.
- I like the way they created tee signs. (I am thinking of using the same method.)
Cons:
-Mostly without tee pads.
-The holes that did have pads were wooden, and were dangerous as we were playing while the grass was wet.
-Hole #2 could have been better with a clearer route to the basket.
-The course layout on this site needs to be updated to reflect hole 3's new layout. You can see the basket from the goal, so we figured it out.
Other Thoughts:
Overall, I liked this course. The trees were used quite well to provide challenge to a waterless course. I would love to play if I happen to be in the area again. The lack of tee boxes was the real downside for me. Installation of tee boxes would have improved the rating significantly.
3/29/21 Update:
Out of the 68 courses I have reviewed, this is where this course ranks along with similarly rated courses:
Rank-Course, Location
40-Shoally Creek DGC, Boiling Springs, SC
41-The Dragon, Purcell, OK
42-Mulerider DGC, Magnolia, AR
43-Lakeside DGC, Elmore City, OK
44-Northwestern Oklahoma State University, Enid, OK
45-Broadlawn Park, Ardmore, OK
46-Alex Clark Memorial DGC, McKinney, TX
47-Lake Bistineau State Park, Doyline, LA
48-North Lake Park, Denton, TX
49-Sertoma Field DGC, Walhalla, SC