- Joined
- Dec 19, 2009
- Messages
- 6,873
Take a look and you'll see some differences in a player's round ratings based on terrain even at the highest levels. Certain players have not played certain courses for whatever reason or played elsewhere based on how course(s) set up for their game or their history on the course. It's perfectly reasonable for touring pros to do that as long as their sponsors are cool with it.
"Taking a look" is not good enough for me. Players will always do better or worse than expected. By mere coincidence some players will have a string of betters or (worses) that happen to line up with perceptions about how different courses play.
Until we can measure the "woodedness" and other features of courses, and then run tests to prove that the seeming correlation is not just happening by chance, we have no evidence this is true.
Those players avoiding certain courses may just be doing it based on superstition.
Or, there may be something to it. It's a reasonable hypothesis.