A couple of things:
- I didn't make a comparison. I asked a nonsensical rhetorical question ("should the PDGA membership decide his punishment?") and thought it was amusing that two people thought I was being serious. Lighten up, Francis.
- Just to provide a specific example, Florida St. QB Malik Henry was recently suspended indefinitely for "a violation of team rules". Technically, I guess they gave a reason, but it was no more specific then saying Bradley was suspended for "a violation of PDGA rules". Would that explanation satisfy you? Somehow I doubt it.
It's really not at all unusual for something as nebulous as "a violation of team rules" to be provided as the reason for suspensions across a number of sports. It's also not unusual for some version of "the real story" to leak out via any number of reliable and less than reliable sources, and I'm fairly certain the same thing will happen here. Then you will be free to rail endlessly about how unfair the PDGA is or whatever less than helpful commentary you choose.
Bottom line - you weren't there and you don't have any idea what circumstances were involved that led to the specific punishment. Neither do I, but at least I have enough sense to leave it to people who do...
Why does any governing body have transparency in their behavior? You think it'd be okay if they started giving out various 18-month suspensions without explaining what a player did to deserve it? If they have no one to answer to (PDGA members/public, in this case), who's to stop someone at the top of the PDGA disciplinary division (?) from doing whatever they want regardless of how reasonable or unreasonable it is?
Sure, this is an isolated incident, and it seems everyone is somewhat aware of the Williams's current and previous transgressions. I bet you'd feel differently, though, if this wasn't an isolated incident and that continued to happen to various players without any explanation and no details passed through the grapevine.
Take the Jake Palmer situation, for example. Because he decided to film it and upload it to social media, we know exactly what he did and why he has been punished. Is a 3-month suspension warranted for him, though? Yeah, he wasted time, but it seems he did nothing in violating actual rules, except for possibly sportsmanship? If we hadn't seen the video, though, no one would be able to judge whether or not the punishment fit the incident. And without that knowledge, the disciplinary committee is free to do as they see fit without oversight.
So yes, I do think it is important for players to know what consequences may results from a player's behavior.