DiscLoser1
Birdie Member
Is there such a thing as courses that end up having a negative impact on Disc Golf? There's a lot of talk about the perception of the Disc Golfers having a negative impact, but what about courses?
In my area, I'm finding many courses that would seem to be unplayable with more than one group due to criss-crossing fairways and pin/tee locations...Others that are built and then seemingly left to rot away as an unused, overgrown area of some park...Still others that have tee after tee of throwing into trees with no real lines to speak of.
A lot of courses jammed in to areas that just don't work, and then seemingly never played again.
With no disrespect meant towards those whose hard work and planning have lead to these courses creation, and with awareness of limits that State or City parks place on designers as far as pruning and location...
Do these ghost town/dangerous/tree courses hurt the growth or continued participation in Disc Golf?
In my area, I'm finding many courses that would seem to be unplayable with more than one group due to criss-crossing fairways and pin/tee locations...Others that are built and then seemingly left to rot away as an unused, overgrown area of some park...Still others that have tee after tee of throwing into trees with no real lines to speak of.
A lot of courses jammed in to areas that just don't work, and then seemingly never played again.
With no disrespect meant towards those whose hard work and planning have lead to these courses creation, and with awareness of limits that State or City parks place on designers as far as pruning and location...
Do these ghost town/dangerous/tree courses hurt the growth or continued participation in Disc Golf?