In most of the information about the decline of traditional golf that I've looked at alternatives are mentioned as ways new players are being attracted to the game. Foot golf and huge holes come up most, disc golf is never mentioned. This always blows me away. I enjoy both sports, but prefer dg. I would gladly pay a reasonable fee to play dg on well designed tracks at a golf course. I'm sure some of my non golfing dg friends would join me, and with a little enticement some would be willing to try bg.
Why push a new concept like foot golf rather than putting in some baskets and embracing a thriving sport that has some overlapping participants, many potential new golfers, and needs the space they control?
Curious what y'all think...does bg distance itself from dg? is there an opp to promote bg through dg? are you ok with quality dg on a bg course? would you be willing to play bg if you played dg at the course often? does the pdga do anything to make this connection for cross promotion and what have they discovered?
Maybe they don't like us because we are a too viable of an alternative, one that may draw more players away from bg.
Random thoughts prompted by this mornings read...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/04/economist-explains-1
Why push a new concept like foot golf rather than putting in some baskets and embracing a thriving sport that has some overlapping participants, many potential new golfers, and needs the space they control?
Curious what y'all think...does bg distance itself from dg? is there an opp to promote bg through dg? are you ok with quality dg on a bg course? would you be willing to play bg if you played dg at the course often? does the pdga do anything to make this connection for cross promotion and what have they discovered?
Maybe they don't like us because we are a too viable of an alternative, one that may draw more players away from bg.
Random thoughts prompted by this mornings read...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2015/04/economist-explains-1