Pros:
- Built on a lovely piece of land. Seems to be a camp or something during other times of the year.
- There's some nice elevation change
- Good hole variety. There are some wood holes and field holes, some hyzer and anhyzer lines, some uphills and downhills, some shape shots and some ace runs.
- Well-made tee boxes. Some are concrete but some aren't. The ones that aren't are probably the best non-concrete tee boxes I've played on. They have the rubber mats with the holes, but they're usually held in by concrete blocks. Many of the tee boxes have brooms, too.
- Signs on every tee box with distance and the general shape of the hole.
- Really friendly locals. I talked to about 10-12 people and everybody was very friendly. One guy talked to me for about 10 minutes about the course, its layout, and even a little history. The club clearly loves this course and takes good care of it.
Cons:
- The layout is a little nuts. Instead of just doing different color tee boxes (red, white, blue, etc), the club just made them completely separate holes. Some holes are labeled S, L, W, or ALT, but I couldn't discern why it was one or the other or if I should be playing each one or what. The signage between holes was great, it flowed nicely, but I couldn't tell which letter(s) I should be playing. There are literally 13 different layout options on uDisc for the 22 hole course.
- I felt bullied into taking certain lines on holes. The tee box would point at trees rather than gaps or point at certain lines. There were also mandos on several holes. This course has enough natural obstacles (plenty of old growth trees and elevation) that mandos should be completely unnecessary.
- There's a lack of fairways. I'm not sure if the club is restricted from removing trees, but a lot of holes have a "spray and pray" situation or one choice which is a very narrow gap. Again, there's so much potential with the trees, elevation, and even the cabins that putting a random wall of trees up with no fairway isn't interesting. I also don't think shaping a shot through one, narrow gap is interesting golf either. One gap is not a fairway.
Other Thoughts:
- I think this course has so much potential. It feels like the designer or the club tried to do too much with the extra holes and the mandos and whatnot. Why does the course need to be 22 holes? Why not make 18 great holes instead? You could put some great par 4's in here and some really interesting par 3's with lots of options. The layout is the best example of this: It's one thing for a local to have a better understanding of a hole, but you shouldn't need to be a local to know which holes to play or skip or circle back to or whatever.
- I always try and think about what my game would look like if this were my home course (playing 2 - 4 times a month). I think my precision would go up since I would be aiming for specific gaps in trees to maximize my chances of punching through the trees. I think my putting would improve at the 30 - 50 foot range. I think I'd lose my long game since none of the holes are particularly long.