Pros:
Layout - It's a tale of two nines here at Bradley Center. You start off on the front side of the park and the holes weave near/beside the park entrance road up towards the entrance then back to the parking lot.
There's a few good holes on that front nine which gives you mostly shorter wooded holes in what I consider mostly park style; getting off the fairway isn't very punished.
There's a bit of elevation change on the front nine but not a lot. There's also a par 4 thrown in to mix things up which is pretty much two short placement shots.
Then you hit the back 9 and you're finally playing some solid golf. The final 9 weaves through the back of the park which is a much more secluded wooded setting.
The lines are way more interesting and they make you work the disc a bit. Bigger and sudden elevation changes come in to play and give this nine a lot more character than the front.
The par 4's in the back are still shorter placement shots but require more thought and accuracy.
Overall the course is mostly a good place to work on your mid/putter game. I think it finishes really well with the final few holes being some of the best.
Equipment - Tees are paver blocks and decent. The holes are marked by colored 4x4 posts. Baskets seemed in good shape. There's a community center right there at the parking lot with amenities.
Atmosphere - I like the back 9 in terms of atmosphere, it's more secluded and a nice walk through with quirky elevation changes.
Cons:
Layout - Most of my problems with the course are with the front 9. First of all it's just ho hum boring and secondly you're playing most of it near the park road.
Some of the fairways were trying to hard and some didn't try hard enough. There's just nothing redeeming about it.
The second 9 was much better but it still lacked any real length or challenge to make the course more balanced.
Equipment - Not a huge fan of paver stone tees. No real tee signs. No other little extras.
Atmosphere - The front 9 is not where I like to disc golf, it's to close to the park road too many times.
Other Thoughts:
After the front 9 I would of given this course a 2.5 maybe even a 2. The back 9 saves it and kicks it up to a 3 for me.
I think it's a good course to play if you're local but definitely not something worth going out of your way for. It's just average.
Was this review helpful?
Yes
No
Thanks for the review, appreciate the comments. I think on average the back nine is more liked than the front nine, and a lot of this stems from the land restrictions. Almost all of the available land is in use, and what isn't could not be incorporated without flow issues. So, we were stuck with making the best out of less than optimal land area. In addition to the restrictions on available land, the city further restricted our ability to cut down trees on the front nine. This forced us to make the best out of the "fairways" that were there. There was probably more thought put into the 3 holes (4,5,6) in that area than any other holes on the course. Also, there was a lot of thought put into keeping the road as much out of play as possible, but again with land issues there was no way around it. Even though there are only 3 holes (6,7,9) were the road should be in play, it's 3 more than we like having...We considered adding distance to the holes on the back nine to "balance" the front, but we worried that adding distance would have the opposite effect by unbalancing the skill level (a solid white level course) we were looking to hit. A lot of effort was put into making sure every hole asked no more or no less, skill level wise, than the previous or next hole. I know this doesn't change how you feel about the play of the course but at least (maybe) you understand how and why it got that way. Thanks