maybe not the most appropriate thread but it was on the front page so...
when i found
this review, it had 7 up votes. i was surprised cuz i didn't find it to be a helpful review at all (sorry adam, not trying to put you on blast personally).
i don't need a novel but this review left me with nothing but questions. are the baskets in good condition? are there any trees on the course at all? how many pads are concrete vs grass? could the course be better if it were altered or is the land just too featureless? info page says moderately hilly... is it all subtle undulation or is there any spot with something more? i certainly don't expect a lengthy review of an open 9er with no infrastructure besides baskets but maybe you could convince me this course is really not worth playing and not that you just didn't like it and couldn't find your way around the place.
my main motivation in bringing it up is the fact that it had a 100% approval rating before i saw it. how is that? i appreciate that there is a growing culture of voting on reviews and participating in that manner and that folks want to encourage new reviewers to keep at it and improve their reviews. but i also think that maybe the incredibly low bar on Udisc has lowered the bar here too. or maybe i'm just overthinking it and being a dick.