Sound advice and least likely to escalate out of control
This is essentially the method I used, it is the right choice. Some time back when I was trying to get him to sign a waiver (it finally worked to leave one on his windshield with a note) I sent him a message on FB and he finally responded yesterday. I thanked him for signing the waiver and explained why it was important. Then I discussed how much effort had been and continued to be put into the course by myself and it's one regular volunteer, and we are always excited to see people enjoying the work that we've done. Finally I said that we had seen him at the course fairly regularly and it appeared he wasn't respecting the course's pay to play policy and, as much as I regret confronting him, it was my only option with regards to sustaining the course and respecting those who do honor the rules.
He immediately apologized and said he was short on work (which is not surprising because it is mud season and many of the services business are closed). He said he planned to buy a pass in the summer when he has work again and he would wait until then to play Redtail. I offered to let him continue to play as long as he committed to purchasing a pass when he had the funds.
I am a firm believer in setting boundaries with people and often find that the more clear and unwavering they are, the better that people respond to them. When mud season begins, I can bring up the subject again with this person and ask him how he plans to follow up on his commitment.
I do allow people to work of season passes - 8 reliable hours on the course but I am sorry to say it just does not work except in extremely rare circumstances. I think it also is the leading cause to the local's abuse of the P2P rule as many people don't pay the fee and assure themselves that it is totally fine because they will put some time in on the course later in the season, which never happens.
I'm disappointed by the handful of replies criticizing a clearly reasonable and rational course owner for asking for help. Busch league.
I wouldn't go a passive-aggressive route. I know for me personally it feels like disrespect when someone is passive-aggressive with me, rather than just talking about an issue straight up and solving it. Now, I get that this other guy is more disrespectful, but like momma always says, "Two wrongs don't make a right."
My advice: don't sink to his level, speak to him directly, speak in facts and limit any assumptions (i.e. if you say he plays 5x a week, don't go after him saying "you NEVER pay" - go to him and say "I've noticed that you play quite often, and I'm happy to see you out here enjoying it, but the amount of money I count on days that you play oftentimes doesn't add up"). This gives him an opportunity to explain himself. If he straight up lies, ask him to leave and not return. If he admits it, explain why you charge, etc. and ask him to comply.
Do everything you can to limit the "he said, he said" nature of the discussion (i.e. count the till before and after he arrives, I'm sure there's a discernible pattern to it), and then speak directly.
Best of luck, I have a dream one day to own land with a course (or complex of courses) on it...so I'm feeling the pain with you of people who take advantage.
This is essentially the method I used, it is the right choice. Some time back when I was trying to get him to sign a waiver (it finally worked to leave one on his windshield with a note) I sent him a message on FB and he finally responded yesterday. I thanked him for signing the waiver and explained why it was important. Then I discussed how much effort had been and continued to be put into the course by myself and it's one regular volunteer, and we are always excited to see people enjoying the work that we've done. Finally I said that we had seen him at the course fairly regularly and it appeared he wasn't respecting the course's pay to play policy and, as much as I regret confronting him, it was my only option with regards to sustaining the course and respecting those who do honor the rules.
He immediately apologized and said he was short on work (which is not surprising because it is mud season and many of the services business are closed). He said he planned to buy a pass in the summer when he has work again and he would wait until then to play Redtail. I offered to let him continue to play as long as he committed to purchasing a pass when he had the funds.
I am a firm believer in setting boundaries with people and often find that the more clear and unwavering they are, the better that people respond to them. When mud season begins, I can bring up the subject again with this person and ask him how he plans to follow up on his commitment.
I do allow people to work of season passes - 8 reliable hours on the course but I am sorry to say it just does not work except in extremely rare circumstances. I think it also is the leading cause to the local's abuse of the P2P rule as many people don't pay the fee and assure themselves that it is totally fine because they will put some time in on the course later in the season, which never happens.
Last edited: