I'm feeling some honeymoon Trident love. I heard EMac say that his trident sort of overlaps an xXx but is a little less overstable, farther flyer that he likes better than the xXx. But I have also heard from friends that at least the older runs were very meathooky like my xXx. I have always considered my xXx a speed 9 overlapping a meathooky firebird and with all of the "speed 6/midrangeish" talk I didn't know exactly what to expect. It was immediately apparent by the sibling shape, feel, and significantly lower wing height to me that it was simply a less overstable version of the xXx that I could get more glide and distance with...but the ever so slightly blunter nose and info I read here had me pretty confused as to how it might fly.
Distance/glide throwing them side by side: CPD>Trident>xXx>FAF Firebird. Don't have a normal Firebird or FL to test. :\
Comparing shapes of my 177 opto xXx, 177 opto Trident, and FAF 175 champ Firebird:
-The similarity between the three is very apparent
-The two lat discs are a tiny amount larger in diameter
-All three have equally flat and have equally vertical inner rims
-They are all equal in rim width. The PDGA approved discs chart says the xXx should be .1cm thicker but by feel that is obviously (and unsurprisingly...) not true. A Monster is very noticeably thicker.
-The Firebird's wing bottom has the typical Innova "X" notched shape while the lat discs have an "L" mold shape with a tiny bevel similar to a Monster L.
-The nose of the xXx and Firebird are equally fat but the Firebird's is slightly rounded off at the top. The Trident's nose is a hair fatter.
-When observing the height of the wing off of a flat and level surface the xXx is very slightly higher than the Firebird and the Trident is very slightly lower than the Firebird. So there is a pretty big difference between my xXx and Trident.
-The plastic on all three is excellent but the opto discs are both marginally more clear, flexible, and tacky.
This disc is really cool. I can throw it 320+ so far without max effort (unlike my xXx) yet it is significantly shorter than my Hurricane of similar stability and it is much more overstable than a fresh overstable EagleX/TeeBird/Rival. It is more overstable and shorter distance than my overweight domey pearly CPD. It is much longer distance and skippy but similar in stability to my new 176 Z Hornet. I have a hunch that with practice this might be an easier, more simple disc for many of the shortish, right hooking forehand upshots and drives than the Hurricane I have been using for a long time. I'm pumped