- Do you listen to disc golf podcasts? How often? If not, what's missing for you?
Smashboxx, after large/prominent events. I'll read the description of each podcast but really only listen to ones with interviews in them from the players.
- What length/publishing frequency do you like in (any) podcasts?
1-hour, weekly. 2-3 hours is too long. I'd like a weekly recap of various events across the country, and how the top pros performed in them. I like the Prodigy social media posts that show how their sponsored players finished in different events for the week. Where was Will @ XXX? Oh, he and Dickerson were duking it out in TN, and here's how they finished. Doesn't need to be a 30-min rundown of each event, but the course with a brief description of it (if known), the TD's, the big names there and who took it down. That could be a 10-15min segment.
- What do current disc golf podcasts do well in terms of format or content? Not so well?
Since Smash is all I really listen to, they're the only ones I can comment on. I wish it didn't take so long to GET to the interview in a podcast. They could be 45min into the podcast before they start. I would move the interview more towards the front-end of the podcast.
- What kinds of topics do you/would you like to hear discussed?
Depends on the frequency of the podcast. When you do a podcast after each round of a Major, you've got to get into more specifics about it than you would a weekly podcast that might encompass several Tourneys from that week. If its after each round, discuss the play of most of the top players, and any odd outliers in score (Ricky got a 9??? - what happened there?, Aces, Eagles, etc.), the weather, the gallery size, the TDs, etc. If weekly, it should discuss more than one event, even if its just in passing.
- If a company or brand supports a podcast with giveaways and/or by buying ad slots, does that affect your opinion of that company/brand?
Nope. Business. I don't blame anybody for promoting anything that helps anybody, unless it's at the
exclusion of something else. JonnyV already mentioned wanting to maintain neutrality so they don't have to watch what they say about any company, which I like, but they're probably doing that at a direct hit to their own prosperity (assuming they could get a major company to sponsor).
- Complete this sentence from your point of view: If I were to start listening to a new podcast, I would hope to hear/learn about _______________.
How players approach practice rounds and shot selection for Tourney day. We get some glimpses of that in the post produced video with commentary "I practiced from down in this spot several times, so I knew the line I had to hit to get out of there". You can't get the visual on a podcast, but it could help a lot of people practice for their own upcoming events if they knew what went through the pros' minds when they map out a course.