do you know what weights roughly
oh nvm dont worry about itMostly low to mid 150's. I'll eye em up closer after work.
"It's not me it's you"they told me its "normal for star wear and tear"
lolololol
right"It's not me it's you"
You seem to over look the fast they are completely different molds, and the blend of plastic they use might be different, slightly. It will have also dried, and done all that other stuff in a completely different environment. As NO DISC MANUFACTURER does this in a temperature controlled environment. So, what dries at 70º with 40% humidity is not going to be the same as 68ºf and 70% humidity.well probably final update
i asked them why the star wraiths i purchased at the same time dont have the same patterns as the sidewinder
all i heard back was crickets
i was using the different molds as a recency exampleYou seem to over look the fast they are completely different molds, and the blend of plastic they use might be different, slightly. It will have also dried, and done all that other stuff in a completely different environment. As NO DISC MANUFACTURER does this in a temperature controlled environment. So, what dries at 70º with 40% humidity is not going to be the same as 68ºf and 70% humidity.
It's also going to be hard to find a consistent shade of color across different molds. There's probably a reason for that which includes. the end user being able to distinguish what's what and the brighter shade that glows pink in UV light is this, and the slightly less bright that glows orange in UV light is this one.
I'm not defending bad practice. I'm just pointing out something you happen to be completely failing to factor in. Variables. By design. By mold. And with the very simple reality of working with material in a non environmentally controlled environment.
Not without touching the plastic, and comparing it to what I know, and have collected over the years. But, by sight in what you supplied. The dimple, and the faded factory related pen marks, and the weight which looks to be remarked. (I used to do re-weigh and sharpie ALL of my discs) My guess is It's going to be an older run, and that it looks harder and stiffer than nearly ANY of the recent star plastic.i was using the different molds as a recency example
i appreciate another long winded response but i feel like you are missing the point again
on a simpler level why is this star the only one that has gotten this terribly chewed up and none others have (historically or present)
do you have an answer for that
Not without touching the plastic, and comparing it to what I know, and have collected over the years. But, by sight in what you supplied. The dimple, and the faded factory related pen marks, and the weight which looks to be remarked. (I used to do re-weigh and sharpie ALL of my discs) My guess is It's going to be an older run, and that it looks harder and stiffer than nearly ANY of the recent star plastic.
Comparing it to what I have, and have beat the snot out of. The only star discs I have that has impact wear like that are old, and got near rocks. The new stuff I have when it smacks rocks. Doesn't show off its battle wounds like that.