- Joined
- Mar 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,365
You try to sound hard when in reality youre not. Thats why what you posted was so laughable.
lulz!
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
You try to sound hard when in reality youre not. Thats why what you posted was so laughable.
I would like to definitely continue to recommend the book We Are Our Brains by D.F. Swaab - a brilliant neurobiologist and the head of the Netherlands Institute for Brain Research for over two decades.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/20260137-we-are-our-brains
The key takeaway from this book is just how important the brain is to our identity as an organ. I can not see how a chromosome or genitalia could possibly be more important than the brain as the nexus for personhood. Some of the primary critiques of the book insist upon the idea that the neurochemical signaling in the nervous system (primarily the central nervous system) is somehow separate from the actuality of the mind - but as yet there is no evidence that this is so. All evidence thus far points to our being as tied up in our neurochemistry. What we perceive as the "mind" is in its wholeness the neurochemical interactions of our physicality.
This is who we are, and that is more relevant than any other physical attributes we may possess.
You try to sound hard when in reality youre not. Thats why what you posted was so laughable.
I bet you find them often. Anyone with a differing opinion, right? :wall:
Some of the primary critiques of the book insist upon the idea that the neurochemical signaling in the nervous system (primarily the central nervous system) is somehow separate from the actuality of the mind - but as yet there is no evidence that this is so. All evidence thus far points to our being as tied up in our neurochemistry. What we perceive as the "mind" is in its wholeness the neurochemical interactions of our physicality.
I'm rather proud of making bigots storm off in a huff. It's something of a hobby of mine. A game I play, anywhere I find them.
You're damn right I'm gonna call them a bigot, and they're going to be ranting angrily about me for days afterwards.
If half the stuff that's been said in this thread were said to my face, people would've left in tears from what I said to them. <3
Isn't it sad that the conservative existence focuses solely on winning, not what is being won, or how, or at what cost, or whether it's worth winning? The rest of the planet is actually living, and those poor souls are just angry that they aren't totally on top of everyone else... :clap:
I don't really post on forums normally, so forgive me that.
Reading through this Epic and coming to the end, the above posts jumped out at me, compared to this one.
I can't help but feel like there's a high degree of irony here...
You don't know me, so let me give you some background as to why I take sport in driving off bigots.
Being trans, a lot of people judge me on sight. Last year, one of them put me in the hospital, because he found my existence disgusting, and while I was trying to resolve the issue non-violently, he got the upper hand when he sucker punched me from behind (and then another 20 or so times, as I tried to get back up from being staggered). I vowed to myself never to let someone like that come at me unopposed, or with the other cheek turned, again.
I don't WANT to have to do that - but these transphobes and bigots refuse to just let me live my life in peace. So, when it all comes down to dust, zero tolerance for intolerance.
It has absolutely nothing to do with "winning", and everything to do with increasing my chance of survival, so I don't end up just another name on the list for the Transgender Day of Remembrance. Easiest way to do that, is to make sure they're the one that turns their back and leaves.
Remember that comment a few back where I was lambasting conservatives for not speaking up when the extremists took control?
See, unlike bigots, I can actually interact with people I disagree with, without getting angry about it.
When I call someone a bigot, they've earned the term, by expressing hate, disgust, or a sentiment of superiority towards a marginalized group.
If I come across someone and they disagree about whether or not it is appropriate that I continue to be allowed to exist? You're damn right I'm gonna call them a bigot, and they're going to be ranting angrily about me for days afterwards.
The right-wing persecution complex is REAL!
Conservatives: *build an entire genre of comedy around the way that male and female brains are different*
Also conservatives: "NO WAY CAN THE BRAIN BE A SEXED ORGAN! YOUR GENDER IS WHATS IN YOUR PANTS!"
Who in here has disagreed about whether or not you should be allowed to exist? No one that I can tell. Seems you're suffering from some type of persecutory delusion here and I feel bad for you.
Strawman much?
Are you completely incapable of connecting two stories? Considering multiple thoughts? Do you lack object permanence? Seriously... the 8 year old hanging out at my place made the connection. How can't you?
Are you so fixated on me calling you a bigot, that there is no room in your head for the concept that there could be any other person on the planet that I could be talking about?
You're spare parts, aren't ya bud?