[Discmania] PDX

[DinosaurThunder]

Maskedavenger made the discovery in the recent approved disc PDF. (shout out!)

http://www.pdga.com/files/pdga_approved_discs_120915.pdf

Looks slightly faster than a PD, could this be the OS disc people have been craving? Or like Masked speculated, a disc with lots of turn?

 

[tbird888]

So all my CFR PDs could become valueless? I can throw them without worry now!

 

[Horsman]

Maybe a One Speed faster PD

 

[bobmcnelly]

So it's a more OS PD2?

 

[halfchub]

(pdx vs pd) 1.9 rim vs 2.1 rim. 1.9 vs 1.7 height.

 

[halfchub]

So middle between pd and pd2

 

[titovanburen]

hmmm

 

[titovanburen]

(pdx vs pd) 1.9 rim vs 2.1 rim. 1.9 vs 1.7 height.

You mixed this up I think

 

[halfchub]

I did. Ooopppss

Corrected version

(pdx vs pd) 2.1 vs 1.9. 1.9 vs 1.7 height.

 

[titovanburen]

sounds like it will make for a sweet disc!

 

[halfchub]

Wonder what plastics it will first be released in. Im interested for sure

 

[BirdieMachine]

When you think of the other power drivers you think overstable, I think that it would make sense that this slots right between the two. DD's are fairly beefy though so I wonder how this will compare, could be like a Discmania Max.

 

[DinosaurThunder]

Wonder what plastics it will first be released in. Im interested for sure

Knowing DM's trend it will be c-line first.

 

[xare]

Sounds like it's just them covering their bases with a disc that already exists... This is probably the "oops, we used the wrong top on this disc" mold configuration of the "test" S-PDs they ran for Christmas dealer discs that year (and you could still get for years afterwards via Factory Store and other sources).

http://proshop.innovadiscs.com/s-line-pd-test-configuration.html

http://www.clearwaterdiscgolfstore.com/s-line-pd-x-out-13280

Basically - any Christmas PD with this stamp: http://s303.photobucket.com/user/jb9456/media/christmasdiscs/IMG_6889.jpg.html

That's what this disc should be. Those things were basically PD-X. Would really surprise me if it wasn't the same configuration they used on those.

 

[xare]

Forgot to mention... those were run in 2010.

 

[xare]

They were beefier than first-run C-PDs. If they ran those in the same configuration, it'd make sense. But old news to superpro PD throwers...

 

[ODRB]

Sounds like it's just them covering their bases with a disc that already exists... This is probably the "oops, we used the wrong top on this disc" mold configuration of the "test" S-PDs they ran for Christmas dealer discs that year (and you could still get for years afterwards via Factory Store and other sources).

http://proshop.innovadiscs.com/s-line-pd-test-configuration.html

http://www.clearwaterdiscgolfstore.com/s-line-pd-x-out-13280

Basically - any Christmas PD with this stamp: http://s303.photobucket.com/user/jb9456/media/christmasdiscs/IMG_6889.jpg.html

That's what this disc should be. Those things were basically PD-X. Would really surprise me if it wasn't the same configuration they used on those.

Except that was a different TOP. This PDX, with a 2.1 cm wing, can't be using the Firebird wing.

 

[Lurp Nuts]

Something tells me this disc will be popular in the northwest.

 

[hugheshilton]

Something tells me this disc will be popular in the northwest.

Haha, yeah any disc called the "PDX" I almost have to buy at least one because I live in Portland!

 

[ODRB]

Haha, yeah any disc called the "PDX" I almost have to buy at least one because I live in Portland!

Exactly. Plus I love my PDs.