Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Now its good. Probably also need a couple of Rhynos for my taste.
No. God no.
Is that response to the Teebird or Rhyno? And just curious, but why do you dislike which ever that is a response to? Not that I am trying to convince you to like them, I am genuinely interested in why almost all experienced disc golfers do or don't like certain molds.
I always think its crazy how much more some companies charge for "premium" plastic.
The difference in material cost from "base" plastic to most "premiums" is only about $1.50 for a 170g disc.
I always think its crazy how much more some companies charge for "premium" plastic.
The difference in material cost from "base" plastic to most "premiums" is only about $1.50 for a 170g disc.
Teebirds and Rhynos are both fine discs. Better than that really. They are both excellent golf discs. But DX Firebirds beat in to do Teebird stuff. And the DX Eagle is a glorious mold for shaping lines all through it's wear cycle.
DX Polecats
Pro D Zone
X Comet
DX Gazelles
Sent from my LG-H910 using Tapatalk
Probably true, but there are other production costs to consider. Just guessing, but it's possible that premium materials take more energy in the injection molding process, and more time in the post-mold cooling process. All that can have a significant impact on the cost to the manufacturer on top of the raw materials costs.
Also, taking the net change in production cost, that will get scaled up (maybe doubled?) in the wholesale cost and scaled up again (doubled) to get the MSRP.
So really, $1.50 material cost increase and $8-12 MSRP increase seem to make sense together...at least from an order of magnitude perspective.