bhadella
* Ace Member *
That makes two of us. The Spinal Tap looks like an awesome bag, but the Contender looks good too and the price difference is significant.
I'm in the same boat. Tomorrow's the last day to pull the trigger.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
That makes two of us. The Spinal Tap looks like an awesome bag, but the Contender looks good too and the price difference is significant.
If you ordered navy, royal or orange then the bag won't ship til tomorrow. PayPal just notifies when a shipping label is created and not when it ships.
And no disc golf for Chris until Sunday afternoon because he's gonna be busy updating the website with up-to-date photos and videos of the radical bag!
I completely agree with you, most people assume its price, but just because something is the least expensive on the market doesn't mean it's not a high quality, the contender may not look as sleek as some other bags but its function and material make up is superior in every way. Not to mention the amazing day to day customer service through the forums here!Still trying to figure out why folks are stuck on this decision that was very EASY for me to make...
The ST is a nice looking bag, but is simply just another very nice backpack bag just like the Grip, Prodiscus, and others. Nothing wrong, but nothing innovative. The Contender is simply a superior design.... AND it both cheaper and appears to be be constructed of higher quality materials. Little things like the key ring clip on the flap instead of the back wall... concealed pockets, envelope size pocket on the bottom front, water bottle holder on the back for stability... I could go on and on.
I spent countless hours trying to figure this puzzle out and all roads led me here. It's the only logical choice.
... the contender may not look as sleek as some other bags...
Those receiving a camo bag will notice a light water proof material which is what we use for the "colored" parts of just the camo bag. The main parts of the bag are all ballistic. This gives the bag great waterproofing ability and makes the bag super light. You should enjoy it. We will not make any more camo bags for awhile.
Cant wait to get my camo Contender! Just worried bc there's all this talk about tracking #s and I've got nada.Those receiving a camo bag will notice a light water proof material which is what we use for the "colored" parts of just the camo bag. The main parts of the bag are all ballistic. This gives the bag great waterproofing ability and makes the bag super light. You should enjoy it. We will not make any more camo bags for awhile.
Cant wait to get my camo Contender! Just worried bc there's all this talk about tracking #s and I've got nada.
Still trying to figure out why folks are stuck on this decision that was very EASY for me to make...
The ST is a nice looking bag, but is simply just another very nice backpack bag just like the Grip, Prodiscus, and others. Nothing wrong, but nothing innovative. The Contender is simply a superior design.... AND it both cheaper and appears to be be constructed of higher quality materials. Little things like the key ring clip on the flap instead of the back wall... concealed pockets, envelope size pocket on the bottom front, water bottle holder on the back for stability... I could go on and on.
I spent countless hours trying to figure this puzzle out and all roads led me here. It's the only logical choice.