Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
If there is no club, there are no workdays.
If there are few players, the fairways are not trod upon.
If the parks dept labor is inadequate, playability and safety become an issue.
I have helped design and install and/or maintain 3 different courses, one unfinished, in my last home base. Currently I'm content with my now home course's condition (poor) because it keeps the course empty and with my local knowledge and a badaxe disc dog (who's exuberance is overwhelming) the solitude is perfect.
Unfortunately, I appreciate the game and want it more accesible to all and thoroughly enjoy introducing new players to the sport. I fear my only recourse is to notify the parks dept of my intent, await approval, and then go about the thankless job of maintaining fairways with the machete.
I am no advocate of cutting trees unless they have fallen or, as saplings, they lean into or begin growing up into previously defined fairways. The designer had intent and I respect that.
When the parks dept won't allow a volunteer to run powertools (aka: weedeater) and their crew cuts scarcely a 5 foot pathway through briars for us players, I can't see waiting months for county action when an hour and a gallon of mix gas could fix one problem. A storm ravaged several holes. Brush piles abound. The parks dept maintanence crew has deemed the holes playable, with no further work necessary. They are wrong. Is the only solution beurocracy?
Here's a dollar. Keep the change.
Agree with this post but disagree with a few of the others. You shouldn't wait for sanctioned work days or just leave it to the club to maintain your course. You should communicate with the right people, learn what needs to be done and help make it happen. Over time you'll get a better idea of what is needed. Check back in to make sure that you're doing the right things.
I can't always make work days, but I haul a backpack sprayer to the course, kill poison ivy and sometimes spray large areas of brush. Have clippers in my bag and sometimes cut branches or saplings. I didn't install the course or have any authority, I just asked what needed to be done and learned the types of things it's ok to cut/kill on my own.
:clap: :clap: :clap:If you're not working with whoever has authority over the course, then you don't do it. I don't understand why there is even any debate on this.
If you are not the landowner, you have no business modifying anything.
Today, I was out on that green and one of the trees, about 3 inches in diameter and sitting about 12 feet from the basket, was knocked over...totally uprooted from the ground. It's not like this was a tight area either. That tree was easy enough to step to either side of to make a putt and there was nothing else around it. Some a-hole took it upon himself to slightly re-design the green, no doubt to make his putt 1% easier.
I hope he ****ing missed it.
Biscoe, yes Nate is with the park dept but his crew doesn't cover Rockland. He has discussed conditions with his supervisors and that is how I know the dept believes their work is adequate. He has been given permission to volunteer his time and hand tools to do work and Nate has told me I am welcome to as well. Landon and Ed have passed the reigns to Nate. An aside: on ribbon cutting day at rockland I met Landon and talked quite a while with him. I had my machete still strapped to the bag cause the previous day I played signal view and cleared brush off of long teepads 3 and 14 making them usable. I apologized to Landon for potentially stepping on toes since I was new to the area and wasn't part of the local circle. Landon thanked me for my work.
Ru4por, thug and others who suggest I'm blurring an obvious line: the line is defined in the first sentence of the op.
Biscoe, yes Nate is with the park dept but his crew doesn't cover Rockland. He has discussed conditions with his supervisors and that is how I know the dept believes their work is adequate. He has been given permission to volunteer his time and hand tools to do work and Nate has told me I am welcome to as well. Landon and Ed have passed the reigns to Nate. An aside: on ribbon cutting day at rockland I met Landon and talked quite a while with him. I had my machete still strapped to the bag cause the previous day I played signal view and cleared brush off of long teepads 3 and 14 making them usable. I apologized to Landon for potentially stepping on toes since I was new to the area and wasn't part of the local circle. Landon thanked me for my work.
DanJon, the specifcs I stated in my response to you were to illustrate that, yes, I do understand the effort of making and maintaining courses and how to work in the proper channels. They are single situation specific so unnecessary in the broader context of the op. The condescending tone prompted me to be a bit saucy. I apologiize for any offense. I tried to make my response as purely factual and bland as possible.
DavidSauls, yes! You are understanding where I'd like this discussion to go. Once an individual, club, etc has permission to do work only then can one begin to resolve the issues between the cut nothing and cut everything factions.
And just so no one else thinks I'm a dilettante neerdowell who wants to make the courses easier for me: in Oconee county SC I communicated with the city of seneca rec dept to maintain one course, worked with a private landowner to design and install another course, and worked with the oconee county parks department and westminster chamber of commerce to begin design and installation of a third, unfinished course. I know my channels.
I desire the most challenging and fair courses possible.