Looks like the halo destroyers have a new bottom piece. Not sure if the Calvins did or didnt but you can def play a record on the bottom of the halo destroyers we got
2020 calvins seem to have it also. They look and feel great
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Looks like the halo destroyers have a new bottom piece. Not sure if the Calvins did or didnt but you can def play a record on the bottom of the halo destroyers we got
I've finally beaten in a Philo Destroyer from the first year they released them(2017?) to the point that I can put a good flight on it. I have a 2018 and a 19 in reserve. Love the lighter weight of these.
Looks like the halo destroyers have a new bottom piece. Not sure if the Calvins did or didnt but you can def play a record on the bottom of the halo destroyers we got
Does that affect the grip of the disc? I know some discs that got a new bottom piece to them feel slick until the mold its self wears in.
Not to me, it was just more an informative post, and to see if anybody notices a change in flight because of it
Sorry the way I read your post was as if you had one of those discs.
Not to me, it was just more an informative post, and to see if anybody notices a change in flight because of it
The 2020 Calvin I got is stable but more middle of the road than anything. Definite dome and the plastic is pretty soft. Nothing like the older McBeth ones. Would place them in the same realm as any destroyer made within the last year or so, at max weight.
Yea, I got to see the Calvins fly this weekend and Id have to imagine that Calvin is not happy with them since I thought I heard these were made specifically to be on the more overstable side and they are not. Now if they would just make some non max weight ones.
Add it to the graveyard of tour series star destroyers not being thrown by the person whose name is on it.
Quick question: Were the AJ Destroyers less overstable than the McBeth runs?
I tried McBeth Destoyers a couple years back and in a couple different weights and they were too much for me. Now, after taking 8 months off due to a shoulder injury in my thowing shoulder I'm finding that a couple of older AJ Destroyers I had sitting around are providing easy distance even at max weight. The shape is totally different than I remember the McBeth being as well. The AJ's have a sharper nose and flatter top.
From what I've seen, yes. AJ Destroyers tended to be a little gummy, flat, and somewhat flippy. McBeths could be domey or flat, but they were almost always really beefy.
If you want a newer Destroyer that flies similar to an AJ, try a Wysocki raptor one. They're fairly mellow and actually have some high speed turn.
I'd have to agree. For a while I was one of the people making gross generalizations about Destroyers, attempting to figure out which ones fly certain ways.
I've come to the conclusion that you really can't tell. Each Destroyer seems to be different, often even within a particular run.
longest and mellowest destroyers are domey pros...they beat in to understable flippy..but fairly fresh are reliable and long..my mcbeths were bticks...but now a year or so seasoned are my straightest most reliable...have a light ricky that is very good..and 2 172 ricks that are nice also