Val tried to save him, but he quadrupled down.
It really was kinda over after the 11th hole though. I'd almost rather hear that than have someone blow smoke up my arse.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Val tried to save him, but he quadrupled down.
Man, I wish Paul & Ricky were battling for first instead of fourth. It's high drama whenever they're on a lead card together. No two human beings on the planet despise each other more than those two.
But 'despise'?
Really? I think Risley is hilarious
I think it's a west coast thing, and Arizona is west coast, no matter what your map may tell you.
JohnE is such a badass. How many other guys on this leaderboard are over 35? Or even 30?
It is more a California and Arizona thing, more an old person thing in those states as the og disc golfers of those states still live there and are used to the 2 meter rule. Personally I like it for a tree or two that would be dangerous to climb on course but not the whole course, that PDGA bans use of it on whole courses.
I bet If this was in effect then these two states just declare a single tree on each hole not in the 2 meter rule, one that does not need a 2 meter rule like a palm of some kind that less then 10% of field get stuck in or another tall tree that does not have a branches until high up and less then 10% of Field gets stuck in.
Rule for PDGA would have to be no more then 25% of the trees being allowed on the entire course as the 2 meter rule in effect and they must be marked somehow obvious.
Or you could just not have the rule altogether 'cause it's stupid. If the real concern is people climbing trees to get discs then the TD just has to say, "New rule for the tourney, no climbing trees to get discs during the tourney for safety reasons." Done.
JohnE is such a badass. How many other guys on this leaderboard are over 35? Or even 30? Such respect for that man.
I think it's a west coast thing, and Arizona is west coast, no matter what your map may tell you.
If you're 2m up in a tree it is a self-penalizing situation therefor an additional penalty stroke is just punitive. Much like making thick shule OB its just unneeded IMHO. If a disc is 2m+ up that means one of two things: it was a crap throw or the disc was going to fly MUCH further than it did. Besides, most of the time the spot under the disc is terrible to throw from because its in the middle of thick brush or the tree itself interferes with the next throw in some manner.
I agree with most of that. Which is why I think making the 2m rule a blanket rule for the whole course is lazy and poor design. BUT there are instances where using the rule and the penalty to dissuade certain types of shots makes sense.
It's the classic example that folks who like the rule will cite...a green with a big tree on it where some players might find it easier to bomb a drive at it and hit the tree, figuring as long as the disc hits a branch and drops down on to the green, they'll be in good shape. And if the disc gets stuck, they mark below and make their putt anyway. No penalty, that's a deuce (or a three if it's a par-4 length hole) and they're rewarded for making a less than accurate shot. With the penalty in play, aiming to hit the tree is no different than trying to carry over an OB instead of throwing along the inbounds line. If you make it through and the disc falls on the green, no problem. If you don't, and it sticks, you're penalized.
But there's no need to make the trees 300 feet away from the basket and 50 feet off the fairway carry the same penalty just to have a risk-reward type penalty on that one green. If anything were to be changed about the rule, I'd remove the option to make it blanket across the entire course. Force designers and TDs to be as specific about where the 2m penalty applies as they have to be about OB areas.