Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
LOL. You told me I wanted lighter Gstar TB and I told you why I don't like them. I don't want a 160s G star teebird lol. Frankly, I don't like lighter discs in general. There is almost nothing about a 162 gstar teebird that interests me. G star plastic is considerably more understable out of the box, beats in quicker, and is insanely flexible compared to their other plastics. It has a different hand feel, specifically on the flight plate. I do not like a driver that gives like that in my hand when I go to grip it. Obviously this isn't a "grip issue" it is a preference in feel which is my opinion. I am very familiar with Teebirds, their plastics, and how they wear. I have been throwing them for over a decade. I know what I like and that ain't it.
let's hear some more negativity on those pro teebirds
I really don't want to spend more money right now.
I completely disagree with 171 and 175 TBS flying differently. If you can notice the difference 4 grams of plastic makes in flight characteristics you are a pretty special guy.
I mentioned they are domey. I have two domey Teebirds that are each 171 and they are glide monsters with less stability than my max weight Teebirds. It is otherwise just a coincidence that they are 171.
For me, the TB was meant to be in champ plastic. The flight of a fresh champ TB is what every other company has tried and failed to duplicate.
I think this sentence describes why all of the Teebird clones are slightly different. A ton of golfers love them, but they don't all love the same one.
I don't Like a new champ, but I do love a slightly worn Star. So I like the Stag because it flies a lot like that out of the box.
A lot of people like a worn champ, so things like the Crave or Explorer appeal.
It's all about preference and that is what makes the Teebird such a cool disc. It's one mold that is different enough over the plastics and runs that there is a disc for nearly everyone with Teebird stamped on it.
No idea, have a bin full :thmbdown: of TeeBirds, but I was one of the few that never clicked with them.
Banshees and Gazelles/Cheetahs (bins full :thmbup: of these as well) were more my style way back then.
I think this sentence describes why all of the Teebird clones are slightly different. A ton of golfers love them, but they don't all love the same one.
It is one of the most iconic molds out there. For me it is supposed to have a high amount of HSS and medium to low LSS. /QUOTE]
I should know this and will feel stupid :wall: after the answer is given but HSS = ? and LSS = ?
I should know this and will feel stupid :wall: after the answer is given but HSS = ? and LSS = ?
I'll also add.. that the higher the LSS/LSF the more it'll dump at the end of flight.
Unless I am misunderstanding, LSS and LSF are opposites. high LSF creates a big dump (hehe he said poopy), but high LSS is a straighter end of flight. Same would apply to HSS vs HST. Please correct if I am wrong though
Unless I am misunderstanding, LSS and LSF are opposites. high LSF creates a big dump (hehe he said poopy), but high LSS is a straighter end of flight. Same would apply to HSS vs HST. Please correct if I am wrong though