Major Tomahawk
Eagle Member
Had that pro been sponsored by Lightning everyone here would be running around throwing Hookshot #1s.
Funny
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Had that pro been sponsored by Lightning everyone here would be running around throwing Hookshot #1s.
Prodigy was started with Large sums of investor money. This is how they hit the ground running.
I'd be interested what kinda of ROI those investors saw.
It's a compliment, actually. He's spreading the brand like a good representative should.Funny
But giving it a name like pig then providing flight numbers ( yes they're never perfect but they give you an idea of how it should fly). M1 gives you no real clue on the flight path. I don't hate their system but flight charts are better IMO.at first i had problems with their names as well. but i think it's far more intelligent than anything else. m is a midrange, where m1 is the most stable, m2 a bit less, and so on. m5 is really understable mid. same system for drivers: d1 most (over)stable, d2 a bit less,… etc. so what are the flightcharacteristics of a prodigy f1 and f7? yep, f1 is the most stable fairway they have and f7 the most understable.
while not perfect their names are way more informative than calling discs atoms, pigs and leopards.
But giving it a name like pig then providing flight numbers ( yes they're never perfect but they give you an idea of how it should fly). M1 gives you no real clue on the flight path. I don't hate their system but flight charts are better IMO.
Is this a joke? I honestly can't tell. I am a believer I throw whatever works for you, but lots of people **** on discs so I cannot tell if you're kidding or not.Similar to the Discraft Deuce.
M5 is the only Prodigy disc I bag, and the groove in the rim has never been an issue to me. It's a good understable mid.
Similar to the Discraft Deuce.
M5 is the only Prodigy disc I bag, and the groove in the rim has never been an issue to me. It's a good understable mid.
I can't point to the exact disc as I don't throw prodigy, but my friend who does has told me there are already discs from them that don't fall in line with the naming system. I want to say m3 or pa3 but can't recall. Someone help meIf they come out with a driver more stable than the D1 they screwed themselves? :\
They just have to keep making understable stuff at this point i guess.
Is this a joke? I honestly can't tell. I am a believer I throw whatever works for you, but lots of people **** on discs so I cannot tell if you're kidding or not.
The Trilogy brands was a foreign disc manufacturer joining up with a big disc retailer. Lat 64's presence in the US shot up quickly with DD using their already established name (Westside got to tag along for the ride)
I think it's VERY regional. Here in East Tn there is a bunch of Prodigy throwers. There is, of course, a ton of Innova & a good amount of Trilogy. Legacy & Discraft basically have zero following around here & MVP/Axiom you'll see some every now & then but not very much.
while not perfect their names are way more informative than calling discs atoms, pigs and leopards.
Getting into the PIASs would help a lot.
So true.Back in my day, I remember when there was only like 5 companies to choose from and I could recognize all of the disc names available. Now I walk past the merch table and I'm that crotchety old man "pshht all these new fangled discs with their crazy names and technology" and I'm not very old and "my day" is only 5 years ago...
Maybe they'll delve into imaginary numbers at some point. The D -i sounds pretty sweet. :|Yep, their alpha numeric naming system is as clear as mud. You want a driver, pick up something from the D line. What's that, you don't like high speed drivers and the D's are all 13 speeds? Well, how about a slower driver from the H line. Oh, you like high speed but want something beefy? How about an X driver. It's all so simple really. (Don't get me started on how they boxed themselves into a corner by insisting that 1 is the most overstable, that is until they make something even more OS and have to make up a new category for it)