Pros:
+ Stunning venue with well-maintained grounds. The player will encounter regal hills and dense forested fairways.
+ Link9 finishes near the parking lot.
+ Bright red guiding signage with tee-colored circles within them.
+ Each tee has its own sign. The signs are simple but present and passable.
+ Stock paper scorecards/map available for the taking.
+ Two tees per link and three possible pin positions per fairway for a lot of variety, but...
Cons:
- ...There is no system in place to indicate which position the basket is in.
- With two or three exceptions, the tees areas are just dirt or mulch.
- The baskets are old and more than a little rusty, but at least they're numbered.
Other Thoughts:
Over the years, a disc golfer learns what they love, like, tolerate and detest regarding courses.
Me? I love courses that have a lot of elevation challenges and put a lot of woods in my way, and I like it when courses have dependable wayfinding signage to help players navigate the course.
IUP has those things. I loved looking at link8 because of its grand downhill grassy hallway underneath the carefully trimmed tree boughs. Link9 was the same way, except totally out in the open. Link18 was a nice endless downhill finale that combined the open nature of 9 with the fairway trees of 8. Link15 is a diabolical maze of pines that will either delight or horrify you.
Link14, my personal favorite of the course, plays within a steep valley with plenty of trees. All along the left of that fairway, there is an ocean of tall ferns, shrubs and grasses that can easily hide from view a disc of any color. I spent twenty minutes searching for a bright orange disc in that area.
I can tolerate bad or unreliable tee signs as long as they give me a loose idea of where to throw. But I detest bad tees.
IUP has those things. While the blue tees' signs do indicate the three different pin positions, there's still no system in place to tell which position is in-play. How can a player know where to throw? Yes, yes, Udisc exists. But there are players who don't have it (yet). Also, it is the responsibility of the course to give players information about the course. After all, any course is updated sooner than its Udisc counterpart, if it's updated at all. And the dusty dirt or mulched tee pads don't do it for me. They were bumpy. Mulch snuck into my shoes every third tee-off. I felt unsteady. On a course this good, that was disappointing to see.
But that's as bad as it gets because even the disappointing links here are fun. Link5 is a simple and straight wide open throw, but there is a steep slanted fairway that could send your disc rolling into oblivion. 6 is the same way, except basically flat. Link1, my least favorite, has the park entrance road on the left, and the fairway doesn't do much beyond the park-style trees. Yet, honestly, all of the fairways here are engaging.
Lastly, I noticed that most, if not all, of the links had wooden beams painted red sticking out of the ground, which I assume is a proposed shorter layout for the course, which I think is a great idea. That would make IUP less intimidating for the newbies.
Overall, I strongly recommend IUP. The tees need an upgrade for sure, and the signage could stand to be replaced, but the disc golfing is a ton of fun if you like hills and trees. Far-flingers will definitely have to take it down a notch here. The terrain is varied, and the faiways are clean & clear. Just be careful on the steeper fairways, and you'll have a fine time.