- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
- Messages
- 22,033
I wouldn't want to play in a sanctioned event with that guy, or people that allow that behavior. Losing a "favorite or go-to disc" would especially imply his rating would have suffered had he finished.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Sounds like losing a disc would affect his rating, so he said F*** it. If the group was in a 3 threesome, they would have to split up and find new cards.
Quitting is confirmation enough. There is no justification for not finishing here.An 888 is warranted if it is confirmed that the player was trying to manipulate his rating. Speculation of what it "sounds like" or what he might have been thinking isn't confirmation of anything, thus not enough to warrant an 888.
What more evidence do you need? He lost his go-to driver and wouldn't continue. If he lost a throw away disc, he would continue because it wouldn't affect his play.Show me where it's written which excuses are good enough and which aren't, and I'll agree with you. Otherwise, it's all pointless speculation. The guy gets a 999 unless there's confirming evidence that he quit to save his rating.
Show me where it's written which excuses are good enough and which aren't, and I'll agree with you. Otherwise, it's all pointless speculation. The guy gets a 999 unless there's confirming evidence that he quit to save his rating.
The discussion around the 888 rule also talks about sportsmanship and conduct, and also that you need to tell the TD 15 minutes ahead of time if you arent playing the second round.
So, in your world, if there is a family emergency, and you tee in 5 minutes, screw you its an 888.
If a player is berating his card, says he refuses to continue playing because he doesn't like player XYZ, and storms off....he's getting an 888, not a 999. This has been discussed several times already.
It's called TD discretion.
How do you disqualify a player that quit?
There is nothing written in any official documentation that the 888 code is about sportsmanship and conduct in general. I quoted it above, direct from the TD report (which incidentally, is about the only documentation describing the 888 code and its uses at all). It is to be used if a player is confirmed to have manipulated his rating during play and/or it is to be used if a player fails to notify the TD of his intent to withdraw between rounds (no time specifics either such as 15 minutes or 5 minutes...just "in advance" of subsequent rounds).
All these other things people seem to want to "punish" with an 888 are irrelevant. You know how a TD deals with players being unsportsmanlike or unprofessional? DISQUALIFICATION. There's a list of 13 examples in the Competition Manual section 3.3 B of actions that can warrant disqualification from a tournament. An 888 code only applies to #13.
Just because one doesn't agree with the reason for a player deciding to quit the round, doesn't mean it's invalid or deserving of branding with an 888.
The Statistics Committee will also be tracking DNFs, Tanking and 888 codes this coming season to determine if any further actions are necessary. The intention, of course, is not simply to punish such unsportsmanlike and unprofessional behavior, but rather to draw attention to it and eliminate it from our play
However, the rule is essentially to cover unsportsmanlike behavior where manipulating your rating is just one aspect of that. Missing the round without notifying the TD is another aspect covered. I'd probably have no problem agreeing with the group that this egregious behavior qualified for 888 if they wished to assess it.
Sounds like losing a disc would affect his rating, so he said F*** it. If the group was in a 3 threesome, they would have to split up and find new cards.
Except in this case he didn't even bother to make up an excuse. He just said I quit in a situation that calls for a 1 stroke lost disc penalty. Why couldn't he go back after the round and find his disc?The fact that we're splitting hairs over the reasoning for quitting a tournament just exemplifies why I wish the PDGA had never come up with the 888 code in the first place. Someone who is quitting to protect a rating can always come up with a legit sounding excuse that no one can do much to disprove.
And hence this leaves us to ponder whether that situation justifies an 888 or not and whether the burden of proof falls on the TD to prove guilt or the player to prove innocence.Except in this case he didn't even bother to make up an excuse. He just said I quit in a situation that calls for a 1 stroke lost disc penalty. Why couldn't he go back after the round and find his disc?
It's pretty clear in this situation that 888 would be justified. TD rules with iron fist, this is not a court of law. The TD decided not to hand down punishment, but I don't agree with it because it sets a bad precedent for the future when people just quit mid round. "Dude, I can't finish I lost my disc."And hence this leaves us to ponder whether that situation justifies an 888 or not and whether the burden of proof falls on the TD to prove guilt or the player to prove innocence.
True, which is why the punishment should be handed down anyways.In a world where 999 were the only option, there was no need for such consternation. You can objectively tell if a player quits. The reasoning behind why is a bit more subjective. Considering the punishment is a slap on the wrist anyway why bother with it?