Emoney
* Ace Member *
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 2,889
So a few recent reviews of AZ courses and the time of year had me thinking and wondering if I should change my rating strategy. I know everyone is entitled to their own opinion and I have no issues with how they review. Just curious what others think about this.
A couple questions.
Does a course that has very few trees but can be played year round, get a higher rating than you would normally give?
Does a course that's not playable year round/Snow get a lower rating than you would normally give?
Basically I was wondering if I am in the minority with these thoughts. I lived in Indiana most of my life and 4 years ago moved to AZ. If I compare the courses back home to these I feel I am not doing them justice.
Example:
(I am by no means saying Fountain Hills is a 5, but how many points does it get for possibly being the best disc golf "Arena" we have to showcase our sport. Very viewer friendly, water hazards on most holes, beautiful scenery/ mountains surrounding it, Great tee pads and signage, and playable year round.)
A couple questions.
Does a course that has very few trees but can be played year round, get a higher rating than you would normally give?
Does a course that's not playable year round/Snow get a lower rating than you would normally give?
Basically I was wondering if I am in the minority with these thoughts. I lived in Indiana most of my life and 4 years ago moved to AZ. If I compare the courses back home to these I feel I am not doing them justice.
Example:
(I am by no means saying Fountain Hills is a 5, but how many points does it get for possibly being the best disc golf "Arena" we have to showcase our sport. Very viewer friendly, water hazards on most holes, beautiful scenery/ mountains surrounding it, Great tee pads and signage, and playable year round.)