Cgkdisc
.:Hall of Fame Member:.
....
Last edited:
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
We didn't save anyone from religion. When things settled down we helped her look at some more mainstream churches and find a place for her to practice her faith because that was important to her and she needed to hang on to her faith. She's very happily practicing that faith in a healthier environment now.However, bringing up some unrelated case of how you saved someone from religion is outside the bound of this discussion.
I want to remind everyone here that religion is a topic we are not supposed to bring up here on the forums.
If you want to talk about Ricky's religion and how it affected his decisions, you could make a case for that.
However, bringing up some unrelated case of how you saved someone from religion is outside the bound of this discussion.
Like Jimb said, these aforementioned beliefs are not common among all christian churches (they are actually very uncommon) and it is wrong to paint all Christians with the same tainted brush.
I'd like to say more, but again, religion is not the proper topic for these forums, except where it relates directly to the subject at hand, vis a vis, Ricky's poor decisions.
This is my take on it. It's not specifically about religion but about science which is rejected by some religions, not just Christian. I have acquaintances who are anti-vaxxers with no religious affiliation as the basis for their views. Jews have their Kosher beliefs and vegans their beliefs on nutrition.I think religion has been used here as an example of non scientific beliefs, interfering with scientific health care. I agree that we do not know if Wysocki's poor decisions are faith based, but I did use an example of where it was. It was not to denounce religion, but to emphasize that decision making is best made through use of data gathering and empirical evidence. Bad decisions, disregarding science and empirical evidence, are not any worse when done in the name of a deity, just equally as bad as when done in the name of anything else. If Wysocki is not reaching out for medical treatment of Lyme because of God, it is equally as idiotic as not reaching out because of some "nutritionist", is convincing him diet will cure the bacterial infection.
The inherent justification of, believe vs science, is a battle you will have to figure out for yourself. And, I agree not to be debated here.
Has Ricky actually come out and said that he's refusing "mainstream" treatment for religious reasons or is this just a usual DGCR conclusion jump?
I was able to have a brutal and frank discussion with her. I let her know that I thought deciding to abandon four children was the worst kind of atrocity I could think of, regardless of the deity she was leaning on. I was able to ultimately convince her to take blood, on her terms. I actually had to go back in on midnight shift, when no family or religious leadership was around. Gave her 4 units of blood before morning, with nobody being the wiser. I was a VERY hard decision for her. Convincing her to essentially turn her back on her faith was obviously a hard sell. She had surgery and was discharged. This kind of issue is fairly common in a hospital setting and not all have this kind of outcome. As a nurse, I strive for judgement free care and compassion, yet this was a time when I went against this.
In his interview with Terry Miller, he stated that to this point, he has not seen a doctor. I am not sure this can be categorized as refusal, but maybe rebuffed.
If he hasn't seen a doctor, how does he even know he has Lyme?
Who actually made a lyme diagnoses?
Just curious
Long post incoming:
This subject is very interesting to me. Like I said in earlier posts, I work in a health care facility. I took the time yesterday to speak with a few physicians who have dealt with Lyme disease from a medical perspective. They explained to me that Lyme can present in two different forms: acute Lyme and chronic Lyme. The acute Lyme is much more common but the problem is there is no effective method to determine the difference between the two types other than seeing how long the symptoms last and whether the patient responds to antibiotic treatment.
The acute kind is what it sounds like many on this forum have had before which, with a course of antibiotics, can be cured relatively easily and quickly. Acute Lyme, however, left untreated can leave permanent damage to the body including joint and nervous system damage. Acute Lyme untreated also leads to contracting the chronic type of Lyme (in fact it is one of the most common ways of contracting the chronic type of Lyme disease).
The other kind of the disease is the chronic type. This sounds like what Ricky's nutritionist unfortunately contracted and has shaped his views on the disease. This kind is not respondent to antibiotic treatment typically and lasts for months, years or even a lifetime. The active infection of Lyme is not present but some sort of antibody is (medical study has conclusively pinpointed exactly what remains in the body) which can and does stay present for a lifetime in some individuals. This type is helped by making lifestyle changes like Ricky has done and, in some cases, can be effectively managed to provide the person with a relatively symptom-free life (again like it sounds like Ricky's nutritionist has managed this for himself.)
The problem here is that there was no way to know whether Ricky's Lyme was acute or chronic. If it was chronic, then what he has been doing is not necessarily bad or dangerous. In fact, it was one of his only options other than staying on constant antibiotic doses for life (which current research has not shown to be very effective). However, if Ricky had the acute type, he missed his opportunity to effectively cure himself, basically ensured he will have he will have chronic lingering effects from Lyme and left himself exposed to potential life-altering side effects (including symptoms from Fibromyalgia). In a way, we have to hope that Ricky contracted the rarer chronic Lyme because his chosen course of treatment was only targeted at chronic Lyme disease.
Bottom line here everyone: if you think you have Lyme, PLEASE see a physician and do a quick antibiotic course. The doctors I spoke with indicated, in their experience, that the chronic kind of Lyme is much rarer and in most cases a quick antibiotic treatment alleviates symptoms quickly and completely. Also, let's pray that Ricky had the chronic type of Lyme last year and that he has not exposed himself to potentially permanent joint and neurological damage. I hope this post sheds some light on this topic for others, it really helped bring this subject into focus for me.
It sounds like you have a good general understanding, but the prognosis is still very good if you take the antibiotics even if you've gone undiagnosed for quite a long time (as was the case with me). My understanding is that it is pretty rare, but not unheard of, for the antibiotics to not work. This is paraphrasing from the Johns Hopkins Lyme disease clinic I went to.
You did not answer the question of whether or not all of her options were exhausted. What did the surgeon say to her? What choices did he give her so she could make a decision?
The options were few. Take blood, to put her system in a position for surgery or don't. The surgeon had already spoke to the patient and let her know he would not do surgery with a hemoglobin so low. The chances for survival would have been negligible.
Informed consent is paramount in a hospital setting. It is the care team's responsibility to provide the patient with all the facts to make a decision.
Without surgery, the patient would have expired.
Long post incoming:
This subject is very interesting to me. Like I said in earlier posts, I work in a health care facility. I took the time yesterday to speak with a few physicians who have dealt with Lyme disease from a medical perspective. They explained to me that Lyme can present in two different forms: acute Lyme and chronic Lyme. The acute Lyme is much more common but the problem is there is no effective method to determine the difference between the two types other than seeing how long the symptoms last and whether the patient responds to antibiotic treatment.
The acute kind is what it sounds like many on this forum have had before which, with a course of antibiotics, can be cured relatively easily and quickly. Acute Lyme, however, left untreated can leave permanent damage to the body including joint and nervous system damage. Acute Lyme untreated also leads to contracting the chronic type of Lyme (in fact it is one of the most common ways of contracting the chronic type of Lyme disease).
The other kind of the disease is the chronic type. This sounds like what Ricky's nutritionist unfortunately contracted and has shaped his views on the disease. This kind is not respondent to antibiotic treatment typically and lasts for months, years or even a lifetime. The active infection of Lyme is not present but some sort of antibody is (medical study has conclusively pinpointed exactly what remains in the body) which can and does stay present for a lifetime in some individuals. This type is helped by making lifestyle changes like Ricky has done and, in some cases, can be effectively managed to provide the person with a relatively symptom-free life (again like it sounds like Ricky's nutritionist has managed this for himself.)
The problem here is that there was no way to know whether Ricky's Lyme was acute or chronic. If it was chronic, then what he has been doing is not necessarily bad or dangerous. In fact, it was one of his only options other than staying on constant antibiotic doses for life (which current research has not shown to be very effective). However, if Ricky had the acute type, he missed his opportunity to effectively cure himself, basically ensured he will have he will have chronic lingering effects from Lyme and left himself exposed to potential life-altering side effects (including symptoms from Fibromyalgia). In a way, we have to hope that Ricky contracted the rarer chronic Lyme because his chosen course of treatment was only targeted at chronic Lyme disease.
Bottom line here everyone: if you think you have Lyme, PLEASE see a physician and do a quick antibiotic course. The doctors I spoke with indicated, in their experience, that the chronic kind of Lyme is much rarer and in most cases a quick antibiotic treatment alleviates symptoms quickly and completely. Also, let's pray that Ricky had the chronic type of Lyme last year and that he has not exposed himself to potentially permanent joint and neurological damage. I hope this post sheds some light on this topic for others, it really helped bring this subject into focus for me.