where is this covered in the rule book? not arguing it, i want to see the language b/c i always assumed #2 was a violation.
nevermind, figured it out.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
where is this covered in the rule book? not arguing it, i want to see the language b/c i always assumed #2 was a violation.
This isn't a tourney rule, but the guy who runs our leagues has a rule that you HAVE to make your putt to win CTP.
Evil
The worst part is if no one makes their putt that was the closest, everyone is back in and we have to do a throw off system. So basically if my buddy who is 30 feet out drills his putt and I am 20 feet out and miss my putt but am the closest, I still don't win.
This isn't a tourney rule, but the guy who runs our leagues has a rule that you HAVE to make your putt to win CTP.
The worst part is if no one makes their putt that was the closest, everyone is back in and we have to do a throw off system. So basically if my buddy who is 30 feet out drills his putt and I am 20 feet out and miss my putt but am the closest, I still don't win.
This isn't a tourney rule, but the guy who runs our leagues has a rule that you HAVE to make your putt to win CTP.
The worst part is if no one makes their putt that was the closest, everyone is back in and we have to do a throw off system. So basically if my buddy who is 30 feet out drills his putt and I am 20 feet out and miss my putt but am the closest, I still don't win.
Don't know where you get that from, Joe. Brad is right. You don't know what I'm thinking... "implicit consent" is an oxymoron.
Not on tax day
Wrong again. You contracted for that by being a US citizen.
This isn't a tourney rule, but the guy who runs our leagues has a rule that you HAVE to make your putt to win CTP.
that isn't a rules issue, that is a parenting issue....
That's why things get seconded.I know a guy who will call a rule on you all day long if you break it, but if he breaks a rule and you call him on it he'll argue with you for the next half hour about how he didn't break it. Quite annoying/frustrating.
If you are gonna throw the rule book at someone in a situation like this........you could also throw this one. Or just be fascist a hole if that's what turns you on.
803.01 Obstacles And Relief
Last updated: Thursday, July 18, 2013 - 18:19
Obstacles to a Stance or Throwing Motion: With the exception of casual obstacles to a stance as described below, a player is not allowed to move any obstacle on the course. No relief is granted from park equipment (such as signs, trash cans, or picnic tables), which is considered to be part of the course. A player is allowed to request that other people remove themselves and/or their belongings from the player's stance or line of play.
Casual Obstacles to a Stance: A player may obtain relief only from the following obstacles that are on or behind the lie: casual water, loose leaves or debris, broken branches no longer connected to a tree, motor vehicles, harmful insects or animals, players' equipment, people, or any item or area specifically designated by the Director before the round. To obtain relief, the player must remove the obstacle if it is practical to do so. If it is impractical to move the obstacle, the player's lie may be relocated to the nearest lie which is no closer to the target, is on the line of play, and is not more than five meters from the original lie (unless greater casual relief is announced by the Director).
Course equipment may always be restored to its proper working order, including the clearing of obstacles.
A player shall receive one penalty throw, without a warning, for violation of an obstacle or relief rule.
A player who purposely damages any part of the course shall receive two penalty throws, without a warning. The player may also be disqualified from the tournament, in accordance with Section 3.3 of the Competition Manual.
803.02 Optional Relief and Optional Re-throw
Optional Relief. A player may elect at any time to take optional relief. The lie may then be relocated to a new lie which is no closer to the target, and is on the line of play. One penalty throw shall be added to the player's score.
Optional Re-throw. A player may elect at any time to re-throw from the previous lie. The original throw plus one penalty throw shall be counted in the player's score.
Copy and paste feature makes me look smart!
Love this. I had a little spat with one of our more seasoned players (and local TD) a while ago about a huge broken branch that my disc landed under. I had the rule book on my ****ter for probably a month by that time so I had it pretty well memorized and I told him that this was one of those occasions where you can get casual relief. He disagreed and said I had to play it where it landed without moving the branch. Luckily I had another copy of the rule book(which he had provided at the last tounament) and showed him this rule. He was not mad at all, he was glad to know it. I guess the moral of the story is to know and follow the rules by the book and if someone is wrong about a rule just show them(in a non-threatening manner) where in the book the rule is.
I wasn't "messing" with anything in front of my lie. I entered the bush from the side parallel to my lie. and the rule specially states
"A player must choose the stance that will result in the least movement of any part of any obstacle that is a permanent or integral part of the course. Once a legal stance is taken, the player may not move an obstacle in any way in order to make room for a throwing motion. It is legal for a player's throwing motion to cause incidental movement of an obstacle."
If you read the who rule in context, the last part is critical. In context I would argue that the moving of an obstacle refers to the removal of an object not causing an object to move with your motion, hence the last part. It's all about context.
Once again I did not hold anything out of the way, step on anything or sit on anything, I entered the bush from the side to establish my lie and was setting up for my shot when I was told I had an illegal stance. In that situation, 95% of the people that I have played with would never call that. And as a former certified rules official and many times TD, I would have never called that.
Can you show me that contract? With my signature? Otherwise I'm pretty sure that consent is implied.
Title 26, U.S. Code. "All United States citizens..."
I get that you don't like being taxed. There are plenty of countries who don't, so therefore, it's not something you have to do. However, you knowingly choose to live in the greatest country of all, the USA, in which we agree to pay taxes in exchange for many services, including defense of our freedom. That was the way our forefathers created the USA. Taxation and representation.
Not gonna thread-jack and continue further, because I think you know what I mean. Nothing "implicit" about it. Every adult citizen with mental capabilities knows that.
exactly. How did that work out for Wesley?Agree to pay taxes? Taxes are voluntary, ask Wesley Snipes~