BillFleming
* Ace Member *
to me, all of the following quotes indicated that they believe the bare bones facts of the story as presented by Jussi to be the truth.
If the answer to "I don't think he procured the services of a trafficked sex worker because Jussi's statement did not address that" then I would totally accept that as reasoning for why these people think that. I am just wondering if there is some other information that I have missed.
All I said was that he owned up to what he did. He said he paid for sex with an adult, that was illegal, and he got caught/punished. That is what he did.
I never said that I don't think he procured the services of a trafficked sex worker....I don't know if he did or not. He might not have known. Can you walk down a "red district area" and tell which are trafficked and which are working voluntarily?
There can be other details to the story that we don't know about nor really need to know about. But....
1. The adult:
a. what age were they? What is considered adult in that country?
b. were they a female or male?
2. The person:
a. were they a true sex worker? They might have been a vice officer (or whatever they call them in that country) doing a sting (I've seen something that he went through a 'pimp', but even the pimp could have been a vice officer).
b. were they someone doing it freely? or were they someone forced to offer sex? (and how would Jussi know the difference?)
None of that really makes a difference. The fact is that Jussi offered/agreed to pay someone for sex, it was illegal, and he got arrested/charged. And he owned up to that.