knettles
Double Eagle Member
It's a neat idea, but both of the long pin positions are bad hole design for the advanced level players the long tees are designed for. They make an ok par 4 for rec/int level players, but for higher level players they're tweeners. It's pretty easy to get a 3 and almost impossible to get a 2 so they don't provide interesting scoring separation. A few holes on that course suffer from that issue, hole 8 in the long is the same way as is 14 from the long tee.
I still think rating par on a 0.5 scale would fix this greatly. You still keep score like normal, but a hole could be anywhere from a par 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, and so on. Some holes would be impossible to score par on, you're either over or under. It would also mean the end of a traditional course par. Two courses that could now both be a par 54 could be 45 and 63 if one was a 2.5 par course and the other a 3.5. This would likely keep one person from getting 8 under on one course and 3 over on another. Pars would be more accurate.
Of course, I understand the complexity and problems that would come from this system and don't expect it to ever be initiated.