Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Jomez does support FPO btw. Exactly the same quality as their MPO coverage. What a world...
I think the OP was looking specifically for content produced BY women, not just about women.
What the OP is doing isn't even remotely sexism in the opposite direction. I laugh every time I see this absurdity voiced. OP has found an area of prior discrimination in his own viewing habits, and is attempting to expand to new areas. Choosing to look at more diverse content in the hope of picking up something worth supporting isn't some weird form of reverse sexism - exposing yourself to more diverse options doesn't remotely discriminate against anyone.Women ARE on unequal footing and it is a result of prejudice.
I wish people didn't feel the solution to sexism/racism was MORE sexism/racism in the opposite direction. It never unifies anyone and only serves to highlight divisions.
OP didn't say they would support ****ty content. You're implying something that wasn't stated.Do they have to have typical female anatomy from birth for you to seek to support them? Or, is it alright if they surgically switched anatomies somewhere down the line? What if they have a mixture of the two types of reproductive sets; will you only seek to support them at a 50% rate of a full woman? What if they have all male parts, but identify as female; do they get a slight bonus?
Count me with the poster who said content should be judged on it's own merits, not the what's between someone's legs.
Women ARE on unequal footing and it is a result of prejudice.
I wish people didn't feel the solution to sexism/racism was MORE sexism/racism in the opposite direction. It never unifies anyone and only serves to highlight divisions.