This thread is to discuss specific holes or ideas for a hole for existing or proposed courses. I thought this would be a good way for those of us that propose, sell, design or install disc golf courses to discuss specific holes and ideas.
This post will take up two pages...only way for me to get all four pictures up I want to get feed back on.
This hole design is for a proposed pay to play course in Northeast Georgia. The property is 90 acres and includes a lot of great features like a pond, several small creeks, a waterfall (30 feet) and lots of elevation.
One of the holes would be a par 5 that plays 1,050 in a straight line from the long tee, 940 from the medium tee and 820 from the short tee. From the long tee, it would require a 390' tee shot to clear the small lake straight across, 280 to clear the water playing toward where the red or short tee is located. There is a bailout area to the left...where the medium tee would be located.
The attached image is from Google Earth of the property that the hole would cover. I look forward to getting feedback.
Adam, this sure looks like a great place to put a hole. I have an idea for you, but first the disclaimers. As someone has mentioned, we're at a huge disadvantage with just an aerial and some photos and a video. Those are all great, but I would never try to design a hole based on the information we have now. Among other things, we have no idea how these routes go through the trees you have. The "north" red route for example, appears to throw right through big trees, and I'm sure that's not the case. Also it looks like maybe the blue tee is on a dam, so it might make a great tee location and a less-than-ideal basket location. We also don't know what trees you have to avoid to hit your 390' landing area -- it looks like it could be tight in addition to being long.
None of that is your fault, obviously, it's just the nature of long distance, two-dimensional communication.
So, with all those disclaimers... Here's an idea that may make no sense in real life, depending on the details and routing on this property, but at least the concept might be helpful.
I agree with Stan and others that 390' probably isn't going to temp a large number of players, especially if it gets windy. So here's what I would consider: put the basket where the white tee is. Put the tee about 750' back in the woods or on the edge of the woods on the south side, basically on the line where you have the blue route now.
So (and of course I'm guessing at distances here), someone who made two great 375' throws would be parked for an eagle three. Someone who could throw 400' or more could lay up to the water, more on the north side, which would cut down on the approach. (The risk of going for a big drive would be getting wet or hitting the trees on the north side of the pond.)
For most people, they would get a drive in the fairway, throwing as hard as they were comfortable, and -- here's what really makes it work for me -- rather than having to lay up, they could throw across the water to where you have the red tee. From there, they could go over the water to the pin, or maybe there's a righty hyzer that has a wet dropoff behind it.
Hope that make sense. I apologize that I'm on the road right now without access to a printer or scanner. Maybe someone who gets it can diagram it.
Again, this concept may not work for you, but maybe it's something to consider next time. To me it's fair all the way through, offers great strategy options, and does a good job of rewarding risky shots that are well-executed.
One additional note: the whole thing would fall apart if anyone playing the three-shot route had a NAGS along the way. But it takes three good shots to get to the pin, two of which are over water. If the pond had a different shape or different dimensions, or if you didn't have trees where you do, this concept would not work.