As a relatively new disc golf player (~3yrs) I find this argument/conversation interesting.
For me, walking into the sport with only a 4 disc Discraft Starter pack, the inconsistencies of disc characteristics (including names) was a daunting mountain of spaghetti to make sense and order of.:doh:
My issue was my comparative reference: golf.
See, I have a fairly standard set of golf clubs. Drivers/Woods: 1, 3, 5, 7. Fairway/Irons: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Wedges: Sand, Pitching. Putter: simple blade putter.
The thing is, I can hate any one of my clubs by any particular manufacturer. I can go to the Pro Shop and ask to see, for example, their selection of 9 Irons and BOOM! No confusion. :thmbup: (We could get picky with loft and lie angles, among other club related metrics, but I believe the point is made.)
This is where disc golf is weak, in my opinion: We have no mutually accepted, general classification system (and no one company has presented a complete alternative/solution):thmbdown:
I would personally prefer a hybrid of Prodigy/Discmania type designation combined with a finer grained Innova/Discraft flight characterization. Names and flight paths descriptors could simply be icing on the cake.
For example, a putter, the MVP Anode:
By Innova terms (infinitediscs.com)
Speed: 3
Glide: 3
Turn: 0
Fade 0
In my mind a: P-3
P - Putter
3 - It's Cruising Velocity target ( on a 1 - X scale where numeric "bins" are defined in terms of discrete meter/second or mph bounds)
As such it's full name might be: MVP P-3 Anode (the best of both worlds)
Glide, Turn, and Fade designations would serve to distinguish the disc among other P-3 putters.
Personally, I would like to see Glide on a 0-10 scale where bins are respective of % hang time, Turn on a -10-0 scale, and Fade on a 0-10 scale.
Ultimately the Anode might be fully defined as:
MVP P-3 Anode [3,-1,1]
Similarly, the Aviar Classic:
Innova P-2 Aviar Classic [2,0,0]
All said, I admit to being obsessive about this topic to the point where I have begun statistically analyzing the 600+ discs on inboundsdiscgolf.com flight path database in reference to various Innova interpretations. I hope to be able to prove, mathematically, that the concepts I have described above are already in practice through common understanding but are as of yet undefined by common, public practice.
However, let us not forget the intended purpose of such systems (and why manufacturers are against them). The point is to improve quality standards for our beloved game and for the equipment we use to play it, from manufacturer down to the green.