Princeton, TX

Jack Culverhouse DGC

2.15(based on 10 reviews)
Filter course reviews

Filter reviews

Filter reviews

Jack Culverhouse DGC reviews

Filter
9 1
Pizza God
Diamond level trusted reviewer
Premium Member
Experience: 36.1 years 1717 played 574 reviews
3.50 star(s)

MUCH BETTER 2+ years

Reviewed: Updated: Played on:Dec 27, 2018 Played the course:2-4 times

Pros:

Replayed the new 18 hole layout today in the mud, adding an update to my review

Cement Tee Boxes
Good flow
A few very good holes
Nice Bridges to cross the creeks
___________
Original 9 hole course
Great Tee signs
Great Baskets
A few good holes

Cons:

Fairways a little close together in spots
No tee signs yet (I believe they will be installed soon)
Some boring holes
__________________________________
Original 9 hole course
very unlevel grass tee pads with a log to trip you up in your follow though.
Several boring holes
Hole #4 is the best hole, but has a mandatory.
No way to cross the creeks.

Other Thoughts:

As you can read in my original review from 7 years ago, there is not much to work with out here, HOWEVER I do believe the new 18 hole layout makes use of what is out there.

Signature hole has to be hole 9 now, although holes 3 and 12 are also very good holes.

Don't get thrown off (like I did) with hole 2, the backet is to the right, not the one right in front of you, that is hole 16 basket. (yea, I parked it before I realized I played the hole wrong)

Also, the original basket for hole 8 is sitting in the fairway of hole 3, don't let that throw you off. Basket #3 is still sitting in it's original spot too, and as you walk down the path, you can see old hole 7 basket off in the woods. Old baskets 4, 5, and 6 are being used for 13, 14, and 15.

Would I Play here again? Yes, I enjoyed the new course. It has a few boring holes, but enough good ones to make it interesting.
_______________________________________
Original 9 hole course review
First off let my say that there was not a lot to work with out there. I am sure the course designers did the best they could with the land given.
But with that said I would not play this course again.
Hole #1 is a boring shot with the only tree's in play near the basket.
Hole #2 is a wide open long shot with zero trees
Hole #3 was an OK hole but had a lot more potential.
Hole #4 has a mandatory. I personally do not believe that a mandatory has a place in recreational disc golf course. Rec players ignore them. But the hole is the best hole on the course.
Holes #5 and 6 are basically the same shot. Hard short hyzer.
Hole #7 is a ridiculous hole though jail. There is not really a fairway to speak of and you had better not be off that small line. (the course is still very new and the rough is very rough as my legs will show you)
#8 and #9 are run of the mill disc golf holes that had nothing special about them.
There is a lot of room out there. There was a lot of area that looked good for a few holes that were not used. As far as I know, that area was off limits.
Was this review helpful? Yes No
Top