Glad to see everyone stay on topic here.
I'm just waiting for this to spin off into either a food thread or toilet humor, or most likely both:|
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Glad to see everyone stay on topic here.
Maybe not specifically Tyvek but I've found this weatherproof vinyl label material to laser print well with the printer set on Glossy Brochure 150gm weight setting, not the normal paper setting which is too hot and smears. Here's what I used to print 4.25" x 5.5" signs at the Empire course using PowerPoint as an easy way to do the graphics. The company has many sizes and a myriad of other materials that may also work as well but this is the type I've tried.This is the best info I've seen in a week. I need to re-do signage at one of my courses now that we've expanded and completed it. Now I have a few more hours of obsessive research to figure out how and where to do laser printed tyvek. Seems like just the right DIY level where we can replace a tee sign if some poopoo head defaces one. That's my biggest worry about buying a nice set of 36 signs from a company, then needing to do a single 2 years later.
10:03 AM Petitioner John A Jokinen not in court. Respondent Thomas G Wincse not in court. Hearing was scheduled for 10:00 am neither party appeared--proof of service filed--case is dismissed for failure to prosecute.
10:03 AM Petitioner John A Jokinen not in court. Respondent Thomas G Wincse not in court. Hearing was scheduled for 10:00 am neither party appeared--proof of service filed--case is dismissed for failure to prosecute.
10:03 AM Petitioner John A Jokinen not in court. Respondent Thomas G Wincse not in court. Hearing was scheduled for 10:00 am neither party appeared--proof of service filed--case is dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Ok...been trying to follow along here. I know the role John has in this saga but who is Thomas? And what does it mean to be the respondent in this situation?
Here are red tee signs, 4-up on a page, and (blurry) example of a white tee on the landscape timber post cut in half on an angle.Are the signs all in Powerpoint? Any 3D models of them by chance?
Maybe not specifically Tyvek but I've found this weatherproof vinyl label material to laser print well with the printer set on Glossy Brochure 150gm weight setting, not the normal paper setting which is too hot and smears. Here's what I used to print 4.25" x 5.5" signs at the Empire course using PowerPoint as an easy way to do the graphics. The company has many sizes and a myriad of other materials that may also work as well but this is the type I've tried.
10:03 AM Petitioner John A Jokinen not in court. Respondent Thomas G Wincse not in court. Hearing was scheduled for 10:00 am neither party appeared--proof of service filed--case is dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Not a lawyer even...….
seems like a waste of effort to even get the restraining order.....
or am I missing something?
Strikes me as odd. For JJ, perhaps it was just a harassment move, that he wasn't going to follow through on, or figured he couldn't win. For MM, it seems very odd not to show up; if you're accused of something, criminal or civil or whatever, you risk losing by not showing up.
Unless they reached mutual agreement to drop the whole thing.
None of our business, of course, and from this distance it's just speculation, without having an actual clue.
But it does seem really strange, to have a hearing on a restraining order, and neither party appear.
Likely just a scare tactic to get MM off his arse. Agree that MM not showing seems odd. A huge waste of tax payer money and valuable court time.
Likely just a scare tactic to get MM off his arse. Agree that MM not showing seems odd. A huge waste of tax payer money and valuable court time.
Strikes me as odd. For JJ, perhaps it was just a harassment move, that he wasn't going to follow through on, or figured he couldn't win. For MM, it seems very odd not to show up; if you're accused of something, criminal or civil or whatever, you risk losing by not showing up.
Unless they reached mutual agreement to drop the whole thing.
None of our business, of course, and from this distance it's just speculation, without having an actual clue.
But it does seem really strange, to have a hearing on a restraining order, and neither party appear.
Depends on the type of court. If the hearing is stuffed among dozens of cases in local court, may not have cost more than a few minutes, and a few more minutes' paperwork.