BirdieMachine
Michael Moore Fan Club President
Birdie, for argument's sake, do me a favor. Or tell me the courses' layouts, and I'll do it. If a player automatically got a 2 on 90% of the holes at this year's Worlds that are 350' and under, what would their score have been?
So, now we're talking 375 max, but deadly at 325, plus the money 25 foot putt. And for the longer holes you have to assume that our player is deadly from 250 on the approach (which I think is a logical assumption). I don't know the course layouts, or I'd figure out the scores. The point is, I think you'll be surprised when you plug in the numbers.
Look at the top 10 players in the World and tell me which ones max out at 375.
Your issue is these Elite players are all accurate at 325. I'm not sure about Pauls numbers or birdie conversions on holes under 350. To beat these guys you would have to be more accurate and putt better considering they would have more birdie chances then you. It simply is not possible considering you would have to throw faster discs to get to certain holes and be as accurate as them throwing slower more accurate discs.
If they play a course where the the max length of the holes is 325 and under I might give your hypothetical player a chance. But it it simply not realistic.